Land Rover Range Rover vs Lexus TX: Specs Compared
Also searched as Lexus TX vs Land Rover Range Rover specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.
The Lexus TX is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 29 mpg combined versus 28 mpg for the Land Rover Range Rover, a 1 mpg advantage and costs about $250 less per year to fuel.
Across 5 measured categories, the Lexus TX leads in 3. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2015–2027
Land Rover Range Rover
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 191 configurations
2024–2026
Lexus TX
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 10 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Land Rover Range Rover | Lexus TX |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 28 mpg | 29 mpg ✓ |
| Best city MPG | 26 mpg | 29 mpg ✓ |
| Best highway MPG | 30 mpg ✓ | 28 mpg |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $2,850 | $2,600 ✓ |
| Lowest CO2 output | 102 g/mi ✓ | 120 g/mi |
| Engines offered | SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI, SIDI; PHEV, SIDI; SV | SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; Hybrid, SIDI & PFI; PHEV |
| Transmissions | Automatic (S8), Automatic (S9) | Automatic (S8), Automatic (S6), Automatic (AV-S6) |
| Drivetrains | 4-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Premium, Premium and Electricity, Diesel | Premium, Premium and Electricity |
| EPA class | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Years covered | 2015–2027 | 2024–2026 |
| Configurations on record | 191 | 10 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Land Rover Range Rover vs Lexus TX dimensions and size
The Land Rover Range Rover is 3.5 inches longer than the Lexus TX on a wheelbase 9.8 inches longer, and 1,159.6 lbs heavier. At over 200 inches, the larger of the two is past the comfortable limit of a standard 192-inch single garage bay once you allow walking room.
| Dimension | Land Rover Range Rover (2026) | Lexus TX (2026) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 206.7 in | 203.2 in | 3.5 in |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 80.7 in | 78.3 in | 2.4 in |
| Height | 73.6 in | 70.1 in | 3.5 in |
| Wheelbase | 126 in | 116.1 in | 9.8 in |
| Curb weight | 5,789 lbs | 4,630 lbs | 1,160 lbs |
Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.
Land Rover Range Rover vs Lexus TX: what the numbers mean
Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Lexus TX burns about $2,600 of fuel annually against $2,850 for the Land Rover Range Rover. That $250 yearly gap compounds to roughly $1,250 over five years and $2,000 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.
City versus highway split: the Lexus TX is the stronger commuter at 29 mpg city, while the Land Rover Range Rover pulls ahead on the interstate at 30 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.
Powertrain choice: the Land Rover Range Rover is recorded with 4 distinct engine configurations (SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI, SIDI; PHEV), the Lexus TX with 3 (SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; Hybrid, SIDI & PFI; PHEV). Across 191 recorded Land Rover Range Rover configurations and 10 for the Lexus TX, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.
Drivetrain and class: the Land Rover Range Rover is offered with 4-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, the Lexus TX with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.
Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Land Rover Range Rover emits 102 g/mile of CO2 versus 120 g/mile for the Lexus TX. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.
Range Rover vs TX: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Land Rover Range Rover or the Lexus TX?
The Lexus TX is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 29 mpg combined versus 28 mpg for the Land Rover Range Rover, a 1 mpg advantage and costs about $250 less per year to fuel.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Lexus TX runs about $2,600 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,850 for the Land Rover Range Rover — a difference of roughly $250 per year.
What engines do the Range Rover and TX offer?
Land Rover Range Rover: SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI, SIDI; PHEV, SIDI; SV. Lexus TX: SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; Hybrid, SIDI & PFI; PHEV.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
Yes — the EPA classifies both the Land Rover Range Rover and the Lexus TX as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they compete directly.
More Range Rover comparisons
More TX comparisons
Comparison id: land-rover-range-rover-vs-lexus-tx