Land Rover Range Rover vs Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class: Specs Compared
Also searched as Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class vs Land Rover Range Rover specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.
The Land Rover Range Rover and Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class are evenly matched on fuel economy — both peak at 28 mpg combined — so the decision comes down to engine choice, drivetrain, and class.
Across 4 measured categories, the Land Rover Range Rover leads in 2. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2015–2027
Land Rover Range Rover
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 191 configurations
2020–2026
Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 20 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Land Rover Range Rover | Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 28 mpg | 28 mpg |
| Best city MPG | 26 mpg ✓ | 25 mpg |
| Best highway MPG | 30 mpg | 33 mpg ✓ |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $2,850 | $2,700 ✓ |
| Lowest CO2 output | 102 g/mi ✓ | 311 g/mi |
| Engines offered | SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI, SIDI; PHEV, SIDI; SV | SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI |
| Transmissions | Automatic (S8), Automatic (S9) | Automatic (AM8) |
| Drivetrains | 4-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Premium, Premium and Electricity, Diesel | Premium |
| EPA class | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Years covered | 2015–2027 | 2020–2026 |
| Configurations on record | 191 | 20 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Land Rover Range Rover vs Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class dimensions and size
The Land Rover Range Rover is 24.4 inches longer than the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class on a wheelbase 14.6 inches longer, and 2,030.5 lbs heavier. At over 200 inches, the larger of the two is past the comfortable limit of a standard 192-inch single garage bay once you allow walking room.
| Dimension | Land Rover Range Rover (2026) | Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class (2026) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 206.7 in | 182.3 in | 24.4 in |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 80.7 in | 72 in | 8.7 in |
| Height | 73.6 in | 66.5 in | 7.1 in |
| Wheelbase | 126 in | 111.4 in | 14.6 in |
| Curb weight | 5,789 lbs | 3,759 lbs | 2,031 lbs |
Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.
Land Rover Range Rover vs Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class: what the numbers mean
Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class burns about $2,700 of fuel annually against $2,850 for the Land Rover Range Rover. That $150 yearly gap compounds to roughly $750 over five years and $1,200 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.
City versus highway split: the Land Rover Range Rover is the stronger commuter at 26 mpg city, while the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class pulls ahead on the interstate at 33 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.
Powertrain choice: the Land Rover Range Rover is recorded with 4 distinct engine configurations (SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI, SIDI; PHEV), the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class with 2 (SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI). Across 191 recorded Land Rover Range Rover configurations and 20 for the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.
Drivetrain and class: the Land Rover Range Rover is offered with 4-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class with Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.
Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Land Rover Range Rover emits 102 g/mile of CO2 versus 311 g/mile for the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.
Range Rover vs GLB-Class: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Land Rover Range Rover or the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class?
The Land Rover Range Rover and Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class are evenly matched on fuel economy — both peak at 28 mpg combined — so the decision comes down to engine choice, drivetrain, and class.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class runs about $2,700 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,850 for the Land Rover Range Rover — a difference of roughly $150 per year.
What engines do the Range Rover and GLB-Class offer?
Land Rover Range Rover: SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI, SIDI; PHEV, SIDI; SV. Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class: SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
The EPA classifies the Land Rover Range Rover as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they aren't a like-for-like match on size.
More Range Rover comparisons
More GLB-Class comparisons
Comparison id: land-rover-range-rover-vs-mercedes-benz-glb-class