Ford Explorer vs Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class: Specs Compared
Also searched as Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class vs Ford Explorer specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.
The Ford Explorer and Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class are evenly matched on fuel economy — both peak at 28 mpg combined — so the decision comes down to engine choice, drivetrain, and class.
Across 4 measured categories, the Ford Explorer leads in 2. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2015–2026
Ford Explorer
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 102 configurations
2020–2026
Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 20 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Ford Explorer | Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 28 mpg | 28 mpg |
| Best city MPG | 27 mpg ✓ | 25 mpg |
| Best highway MPG | 29 mpg | 33 mpg ✓ |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $2,200 ✓ | $2,700 |
| Lowest CO2 output | 322 g/mi | 311 g/mi ✓ |
| Engines offered | SIDI, SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; FFV, SIDI; Stop-Start | SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI |
| Transmissions | Automatic (S10), Automatic 10-spd, Automatic (S6) | Automatic (AM8) |
| Drivetrains | Part-time 4-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Regular, Gasoline or E85 | Premium |
| EPA class | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Years covered | 2015–2026 | 2020–2026 |
| Configurations on record | 102 | 20 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Ford Explorer vs Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class dimensions and size
The Ford Explorer is 16.5 inches longer than the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class on a wheelbase 7.9 inches longer, and 698.9 lbs heavier. Both clear the roughly 200 inches of usable length in a standard single garage bay.
| Dimension | Ford Explorer (2026) | Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class (2026) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 198.8 in | 182.3 in | 16.5 in |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 78.7 in | 72 in | 6.7 in |
| Height | 70.1 in | 66.5 in | 3.5 in |
| Wheelbase | 119.3 in | 111.4 in | 7.9 in |
| Curb weight | 4,458 lbs | 3,759 lbs | 699 lbs |
Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.
Ford Explorer vs Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class: what the numbers mean
Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Ford Explorer burns about $2,200 of fuel annually against $2,700 for the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class. That $500 yearly gap compounds to roughly $2,500 over five years and $4,000 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.
City versus highway split: the Ford Explorer is the stronger commuter at 27 mpg city, while the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class pulls ahead on the interstate at 33 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.
Powertrain choice: the Ford Explorer is recorded with 4 distinct engine configurations (SIDI, SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; FFV), the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class with 2 (SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI). Across 102 recorded Ford Explorer configurations and 20 for the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.
Drivetrain and class: the Ford Explorer is offered with Part-time 4-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class with Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.
Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class emits 311 g/mile of CO2 versus 322 g/mile for the Ford Explorer. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.
Explorer vs GLB-Class: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Ford Explorer or the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class?
The Ford Explorer and Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class are evenly matched on fuel economy — both peak at 28 mpg combined — so the decision comes down to engine choice, drivetrain, and class.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Ford Explorer runs about $2,200 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,700 for the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class — a difference of roughly $500 per year.
What engines do the Explorer and GLB-Class offer?
Ford Explorer: SIDI, SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; FFV, SIDI; Stop-Start. Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class: SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
The EPA classifies the Ford Explorer as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they aren't a like-for-like match on size.
More Explorer comparisons
More GLB-Class comparisons
Comparison id: ford-explorer-vs-mercedes-benz-glb-class