Ford Explorer vs Volkswagen Atlas: Specs Compared
Also searched as Volkswagen Atlas vs Ford Explorer specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.
The Ford Explorer is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 28 mpg combined versus 25 mpg for the Volkswagen Atlas, a 3 mpg advantage and costs about $250 less per year to fuel.
Across 4 measured categories, the Ford Explorer leads in 4. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2015–2026
Ford Explorer
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 102 configurations
2018–2027
Volkswagen Atlas
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 57 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Ford Explorer | Volkswagen Atlas |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 28 mpg ✓ | 25 mpg |
| Best city MPG | 27 mpg ✓ | 22 mpg |
| Best highway MPG | 29 mpg | 29 mpg |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $2,200 ✓ | $2,450 |
| Lowest CO2 output | 322 g/mi ✓ | 364 g/mi |
| Engines offered | SIDI, SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; FFV, SIDI; Stop-Start | SIDI |
| Transmissions | Automatic (S10), Automatic 10-spd, Automatic (S6) | Automatic (S8) |
| Drivetrains | Part-time 4-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive | All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Regular, Gasoline or E85 | Regular |
| EPA class | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Years covered | 2015–2026 | 2018–2027 |
| Configurations on record | 102 | 57 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Ford Explorer vs Volkswagen Atlas dimensions and size
The Volkswagen Atlas is 2 inches longer than the Ford Explorer on a wheelbase 2 inches shorter, and 15.4 lbs lighter. At over 200 inches, the larger of the two is past the comfortable limit of a standard 192-inch single garage bay once you allow walking room.
| Dimension | Ford Explorer (2026) | Volkswagen Atlas (2026) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 198.8 in | 200.8 in | 2 in |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 78.7 in | 78 in | 0.8 in |
| Height | 70.1 in | 68.9 in | 1.2 in |
| Wheelbase | 119.3 in | 117.3 in | 2 in |
| Curb weight | 4,458 lbs | 4,442 lbs | 15 lbs |
Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.
Ford Explorer vs Volkswagen Atlas: what the numbers mean
Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Ford Explorer burns about $2,200 of fuel annually against $2,450 for the Volkswagen Atlas. That $250 yearly gap compounds to roughly $1,250 over five years and $2,000 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.
City versus highway split: the Ford Explorer is the stronger commuter at 27 mpg city, while the Volkswagen Atlas pulls ahead on the interstate at 29 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.
Powertrain choice: the Ford Explorer is recorded with 4 distinct engine configurations (SIDI, SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; FFV), the Volkswagen Atlas with 1 (SIDI). Across 102 recorded Ford Explorer configurations and 57 for the Volkswagen Atlas, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.
Drivetrain and class: the Ford Explorer is offered with Part-time 4-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, the Volkswagen Atlas with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.
Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Ford Explorer emits 322 g/mile of CO2 versus 364 g/mile for the Volkswagen Atlas. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.
Explorer vs Atlas: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Ford Explorer or the Volkswagen Atlas?
The Ford Explorer is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 28 mpg combined versus 25 mpg for the Volkswagen Atlas, a 3 mpg advantage and costs about $250 less per year to fuel.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Ford Explorer runs about $2,200 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,450 for the Volkswagen Atlas — a difference of roughly $250 per year.
What engines do the Explorer and Atlas offer?
Ford Explorer: SIDI, SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; FFV, SIDI; Stop-Start. Volkswagen Atlas: SIDI.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
The EPA classifies the Ford Explorer as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and the Volkswagen Atlas as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they aren't a like-for-like match on size.
More Explorer comparisons
More Atlas comparisons
Comparison id: ford-explorer-vs-volkswagen-atlas