Ford Explorer vs Jeep Wrangler: Specs Compared
Also searched as Jeep Wrangler vs Ford Explorer specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.
The Ford Explorer is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 28 mpg combined versus 25 mpg for the Jeep Wrangler, a 3 mpg advantage and costs about $350 less per year to fuel.
Across 4 measured categories, the Ford Explorer leads in 3. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2015–2026
Ford Explorer
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 102 configurations
2015–2027
Jeep Wrangler
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 104 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Ford Explorer | Jeep Wrangler |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 28 mpg ✓ | 25 mpg |
| Best city MPG | 27 mpg ✓ | 23 mpg |
| Best highway MPG | 29 mpg | 29 mpg |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $2,200 ✓ | $2,550 |
| Lowest CO2 output | 322 g/mi | 230 g/mi ✓ |
| Engines offered | SIDI, SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; FFV, SIDI; Stop-Start | 3.6, SIDI, 6.4, SIDI; PHEV |
| Transmissions | Automatic (S10), Automatic 10-spd, Automatic (S6) | Manual 6-spd, Automatic 8-spd, Automatic 5-spd |
| Drivetrains | Part-time 4-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive | 4-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Regular, Gasoline or E85 | Regular, Premium, Regular Gas and Electricity |
| EPA class | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Years covered | 2015–2026 | 2015–2027 |
| Configurations on record | 102 | 104 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Ford Explorer vs Jeep Wrangler dimensions and size
The Ford Explorer is 16.9 inches longer than the Jeep Wrangler on a wheelbase 0.8 inches longer, and 542.3 lbs lighter. Both clear the roughly 200 inches of usable length in a standard single garage bay.
| Dimension | Ford Explorer (2026) | Jeep Wrangler (2026) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 198.8 in | 181.9 in | 16.9 in |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 78.7 in | 74 in | 4.7 in |
| Height | 70.1 in | 73.6 in | 3.5 in |
| Wheelbase | 119.3 in | 118.5 in | 0.8 in |
| Curb weight | 4,458 lbs | 5,000 lbs | 542 lbs |
Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.
Ford Explorer vs Jeep Wrangler: what the numbers mean
Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Ford Explorer burns about $2,200 of fuel annually against $2,550 for the Jeep Wrangler. That $350 yearly gap compounds to roughly $1,750 over five years and $2,800 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.
City versus highway split: the Ford Explorer is the stronger commuter at 27 mpg city, while the Jeep Wrangler pulls ahead on the interstate at 29 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.
Powertrain choice: the Ford Explorer is recorded with 4 distinct engine configurations (SIDI, SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; FFV), the Jeep Wrangler with 4 (3.6, SIDI, 6.4). Across 102 recorded Ford Explorer configurations and 104 for the Jeep Wrangler, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.
Drivetrain and class: the Ford Explorer is offered with Part-time 4-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, the Jeep Wrangler with 4-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.
Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Jeep Wrangler emits 230 g/mile of CO2 versus 322 g/mile for the Ford Explorer. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.
Explorer vs Wrangler: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Ford Explorer or the Jeep Wrangler?
The Ford Explorer is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 28 mpg combined versus 25 mpg for the Jeep Wrangler, a 3 mpg advantage and costs about $350 less per year to fuel.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Ford Explorer runs about $2,200 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,550 for the Jeep Wrangler — a difference of roughly $350 per year.
What engines do the Explorer and Wrangler offer?
Ford Explorer: SIDI, SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; FFV, SIDI; Stop-Start. Jeep Wrangler: 3.6, SIDI, 6.4, SIDI; PHEV.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
The EPA classifies the Ford Explorer as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and the Jeep Wrangler as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they aren't a like-for-like match on size.
More Explorer comparisons
More Wrangler comparisons
Comparison id: ford-explorer-vs-jeep-wrangler