Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class vs Mitsubishi Outlander: Specs Compared
Also searched as Mitsubishi Outlander vs Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.
The Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class and Mitsubishi Outlander are evenly matched on fuel economy — both peak at 28 mpg combined — so the decision comes down to engine choice, drivetrain, and class.
Across 4 measured categories, the Mitsubishi Outlander leads in 3. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2020–2026
Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 20 configurations
2015–2027
Mitsubishi Outlander
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 88 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class | Mitsubishi Outlander |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 28 mpg | 28 mpg |
| Best city MPG | 25 mpg | 27 mpg ✓ |
| Best highway MPG | 33 mpg ✓ | 32 mpg |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $2,700 | $2,200 ✓ |
| Lowest CO2 output | 311 g/mi | 97 g/mi ✓ |
| Engines offered | SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI | 2.4, 2.0, PHEV, SIDI & PFI; Mild Hybrid |
| Transmissions | Automatic (AM8) | Automatic (AV-S6), Automatic (A1), Automatic (AV-S8) |
| Drivetrains | Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive | 4-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Premium | Regular, Regular Gas and Electricity, Premium |
| EPA class | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Years covered | 2020–2026 | 2015–2027 |
| Configurations on record | 20 | 88 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class vs Mitsubishi Outlander dimensions and size
The Mitsubishi Outlander is 3.2 inches longer than the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class on a wheelbase 5.1 inches shorter, and 33.1 lbs lighter. Both clear the roughly 200 inches of usable length in a standard single garage bay.
| Dimension | Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class (2026) | Mitsubishi Outlander (2026) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 182.3 in | 185.4 in | 3.2 in |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 72 in | 73.2 in | 1.2 in |
| Height | 66.5 in | 68.9 in | 2.4 in |
| Wheelbase | 111.4 in | 106.3 in | 5.1 in |
| Curb weight | 3,759 lbs | 3,726 lbs | 33 lbs |
Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.
Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class vs Mitsubishi Outlander: what the numbers mean
Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Mitsubishi Outlander burns about $2,200 of fuel annually against $2,700 for the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class. That $500 yearly gap compounds to roughly $2,500 over five years and $4,000 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.
City versus highway split: the Mitsubishi Outlander is the stronger commuter at 27 mpg city, while the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class pulls ahead on the interstate at 33 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.
Powertrain choice: the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class is recorded with 2 distinct engine configurations (SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI), the Mitsubishi Outlander with 4 (2.4, 2.0, PHEV). Across 20 recorded Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class configurations and 88 for the Mitsubishi Outlander, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.
Drivetrain and class: the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class is offered with Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive, the Mitsubishi Outlander with 4-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.
Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Mitsubishi Outlander emits 97 g/mile of CO2 versus 311 g/mile for the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.
GLB-Class vs Outlander: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class or the Mitsubishi Outlander?
The Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class and Mitsubishi Outlander are evenly matched on fuel economy — both peak at 28 mpg combined — so the decision comes down to engine choice, drivetrain, and class.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander runs about $2,200 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,700 for the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class — a difference of roughly $500 per year.
What engines do the GLB-Class and Outlander offer?
Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class: SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI. Mitsubishi Outlander: 2.4, 2.0, PHEV, SIDI & PFI; Mild Hybrid.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
Yes — the EPA classifies both the Mercedes-Benz GLB-Class and the Mitsubishi Outlander as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they compete directly.
More GLB-Class comparisons
More Outlander comparisons
Comparison id: mercedes-benz-glb-class-vs-mitsubishi-outlander