Mitsubishi Outlander vs Volvo XC60: Specs Compared
Also searched as Volvo XC60 vs Mitsubishi Outlander specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.
The Mitsubishi Outlander and Volvo XC60 are evenly matched on fuel economy — both peak at 28 mpg combined — so the decision comes down to engine choice, drivetrain, and class.
Across 4 measured categories, the Mitsubishi Outlander leads in 3. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2015–2027
Mitsubishi Outlander
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 88 configurations
2015–2027
Volvo XC60
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 44 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Mitsubishi Outlander | Volvo XC60 |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 28 mpg | 28 mpg |
| Best city MPG | 27 mpg | 28 mpg ✓ |
| Best highway MPG | 32 mpg ✓ | 31 mpg |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $2,200 ✓ | $2,300 |
| Lowest CO2 output | 97 g/mi ✓ | 122 g/mi |
| Engines offered | 2.4, 2.0, PHEV, SIDI & PFI; Mild Hybrid | SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI; PHEV, 2.0, SIDI |
| Transmissions | Automatic (AV-S6), Automatic (A1), Automatic (AV-S8) | Automatic (S8), Automatic (S6) |
| Drivetrains | 4-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Regular, Regular Gas and Electricity, Premium | Premium, Premium and Electricity, Regular |
| EPA class | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Years covered | 2015–2027 | 2015–2027 |
| Configurations on record | 88 | 44 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Mitsubishi Outlander vs Volvo XC60 dimensions and size
The Mitsubishi Outlander is 0.4 inches longer than the Volvo XC60 on a wheelbase 6.7 inches shorter, and 394.6 lbs lighter. Both clear the roughly 200 inches of usable length in a standard single garage bay.
| Dimension | Mitsubishi Outlander (2026) | Volvo XC60 (2026) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 185.4 in | 185 in | 0.4 in |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 73.2 in | 74.8 in | 1.6 in |
| Height | 68.9 in | 65.4 in | 3.5 in |
| Wheelbase | 106.3 in | 113 in | 6.7 in |
| Curb weight | 3,726 lbs | 4,120 lbs | 395 lbs |
Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.
Mitsubishi Outlander vs Volvo XC60: what the numbers mean
Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Mitsubishi Outlander burns about $2,200 of fuel annually against $2,300 for the Volvo XC60. That $100 yearly gap compounds to roughly $500 over five years and $800 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.
City versus highway split: the Volvo XC60 is the stronger commuter at 28 mpg city, while the Mitsubishi Outlander pulls ahead on the interstate at 32 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.
Powertrain choice: the Mitsubishi Outlander is recorded with 4 distinct engine configurations (2.4, 2.0, PHEV), the Volvo XC60 with 4 (SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI; PHEV, 2.0). Across 88 recorded Mitsubishi Outlander configurations and 44 for the Volvo XC60, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.
Drivetrain and class: the Mitsubishi Outlander is offered with 4-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, the Volvo XC60 with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.
Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Mitsubishi Outlander emits 97 g/mile of CO2 versus 122 g/mile for the Volvo XC60. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.
Outlander vs XC60: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Mitsubishi Outlander or the Volvo XC60?
The Mitsubishi Outlander and Volvo XC60 are evenly matched on fuel economy — both peak at 28 mpg combined — so the decision comes down to engine choice, drivetrain, and class.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander runs about $2,200 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,300 for the Volvo XC60 — a difference of roughly $100 per year.
What engines do the Outlander and XC60 offer?
Mitsubishi Outlander: 2.4, 2.0, PHEV, SIDI & PFI; Mild Hybrid. Volvo XC60: SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI; PHEV, 2.0, SIDI.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
Yes — the EPA classifies both the Mitsubishi Outlander and the Volvo XC60 as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they compete directly.
More Outlander comparisons
More XC60 comparisons
Comparison id: mitsubishi-outlander-vs-volvo-xc60