Jaguar F-Pace vs Land Rover Range Rover: Specs Compared
Also searched as Land Rover Range Rover vs Jaguar F-Pace specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.
The Jaguar F-Pace is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 29 mpg combined versus 28 mpg for the Land Rover Range Rover, a 1 mpg advantage and costs about $100 less per year to fuel.
Across 4 measured categories, the Jaguar F-Pace leads in 3. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2017–2026
Jaguar F-Pace
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 35 configurations
2015–2027
Land Rover Range Rover
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 191 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Jaguar F-Pace | Land Rover Range Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 29 mpg ✓ | 28 mpg |
| Best city MPG | 26 mpg | 26 mpg |
| Best highway MPG | 33 mpg ✓ | 30 mpg |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $2,750 ✓ | $2,850 |
| Lowest CO2 output | 352 g/mi | 102 g/mi ✓ |
| Engines offered | SIDI, SIDI; Mild Hybrid, 2.0 | SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI, SIDI; PHEV, SIDI; SV |
| Transmissions | Automatic (S8) | Automatic (S8), Automatic (S9) |
| Drivetrains | All-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive | 4-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Premium, Diesel | Premium, Premium and Electricity, Diesel |
| EPA class | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Years covered | 2017–2026 | 2015–2027 |
| Configurations on record | 35 | 191 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Jaguar F-Pace vs Land Rover Range Rover dimensions and size
The Land Rover Range Rover is 20.1 inches longer than the Jaguar F-Pace on a wheelbase 13 inches longer, and 1,909.2 lbs heavier. At over 200 inches, the larger of the two is past the comfortable limit of a standard 192-inch single garage bay once you allow walking room.
| Dimension | Jaguar F-Pace (2026) | Land Rover Range Rover (2026) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 186.6 in | 206.7 in | 20.1 in |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 76.4 in | 80.7 in | 4.3 in |
| Height | 65.4 in | 73.6 in | 8.3 in |
| Wheelbase | 113 in | 126 in | 13 in |
| Curb weight | 3,880 lbs | 5,789 lbs | 1,909 lbs |
Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.
Jaguar F-Pace vs Land Rover Range Rover: what the numbers mean
Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Jaguar F-Pace burns about $2,750 of fuel annually against $2,850 for the Land Rover Range Rover. That $100 yearly gap compounds to roughly $500 over five years and $800 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.
City versus highway split: the Land Rover Range Rover is the stronger commuter at 26 mpg city, while the Jaguar F-Pace pulls ahead on the interstate at 33 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.
Powertrain choice: the Jaguar F-Pace is recorded with 3 distinct engine configurations (SIDI, SIDI; Mild Hybrid, 2.0), the Land Rover Range Rover with 4 (SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI, SIDI; PHEV). Across 35 recorded Jaguar F-Pace configurations and 191 for the Land Rover Range Rover, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.
Drivetrain and class: the Jaguar F-Pace is offered with All-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive, the Land Rover Range Rover with 4-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.
Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Land Rover Range Rover emits 102 g/mile of CO2 versus 352 g/mile for the Jaguar F-Pace. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.
F-Pace vs Range Rover: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Jaguar F-Pace or the Land Rover Range Rover?
The Jaguar F-Pace is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 29 mpg combined versus 28 mpg for the Land Rover Range Rover, a 1 mpg advantage and costs about $100 less per year to fuel.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Jaguar F-Pace runs about $2,750 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,850 for the Land Rover Range Rover — a difference of roughly $100 per year.
What engines do the F-Pace and Range Rover offer?
Jaguar F-Pace: SIDI, SIDI; Mild Hybrid, 2.0. Land Rover Range Rover: SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI, SIDI; PHEV, SIDI; SV.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
The EPA classifies the Jaguar F-Pace as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and the Land Rover Range Rover as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they aren't a like-for-like match on size.
More F-Pace comparisons
More Range Rover comparisons
Comparison id: jaguar-f-pace-vs-land-rover-range-rover