Jaguar F-Pace vs Mitsubishi Outlander: Specs Compared
Also searched as Mitsubishi Outlander vs Jaguar F-Pace specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.
The Jaguar F-Pace is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 29 mpg combined versus 28 mpg for the Mitsubishi Outlander, a 1 mpg advantage and costs about $550 less per year to fuel.
Across 5 measured categories, the Mitsubishi Outlander leads in 3. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2017–2026
Jaguar F-Pace
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 35 configurations
2015–2027
Mitsubishi Outlander
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 88 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Jaguar F-Pace | Mitsubishi Outlander |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 29 mpg ✓ | 28 mpg |
| Best city MPG | 26 mpg | 27 mpg ✓ |
| Best highway MPG | 33 mpg ✓ | 32 mpg |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $2,750 | $2,200 ✓ |
| Lowest CO2 output | 352 g/mi | 97 g/mi ✓ |
| Engines offered | SIDI, SIDI; Mild Hybrid, 2.0 | 2.4, 2.0, PHEV, SIDI & PFI; Mild Hybrid |
| Transmissions | Automatic (S8) | Automatic (AV-S6), Automatic (A1), Automatic (AV-S8) |
| Drivetrains | All-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive | 4-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Premium, Diesel | Regular, Regular Gas and Electricity, Premium |
| EPA class | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Years covered | 2017–2026 | 2015–2027 |
| Configurations on record | 35 | 88 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Jaguar F-Pace vs Mitsubishi Outlander dimensions and size
The Jaguar F-Pace is 1.2 inches longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander on a wheelbase 6.7 inches longer, and 154.3 lbs heavier. Both clear the roughly 200 inches of usable length in a standard single garage bay.
| Dimension | Jaguar F-Pace (2026) | Mitsubishi Outlander (2026) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 186.6 in | 185.4 in | 1.2 in |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 76.4 in | 73.2 in | 3.1 in |
| Height | 65.4 in | 68.9 in | 3.5 in |
| Wheelbase | 113 in | 106.3 in | 6.7 in |
| Curb weight | 3,880 lbs | 3,726 lbs | 154 lbs |
Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.
Jaguar F-Pace vs Mitsubishi Outlander: what the numbers mean
Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Mitsubishi Outlander burns about $2,200 of fuel annually against $2,750 for the Jaguar F-Pace. That $550 yearly gap compounds to roughly $2,750 over five years and $4,400 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.
City versus highway split: the Mitsubishi Outlander is the stronger commuter at 27 mpg city, while the Jaguar F-Pace pulls ahead on the interstate at 33 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.
Powertrain choice: the Jaguar F-Pace is recorded with 3 distinct engine configurations (SIDI, SIDI; Mild Hybrid, 2.0), the Mitsubishi Outlander with 4 (2.4, 2.0, PHEV). Across 35 recorded Jaguar F-Pace configurations and 88 for the Mitsubishi Outlander, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.
Drivetrain and class: the Jaguar F-Pace is offered with All-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive, the Mitsubishi Outlander with 4-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.
Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Mitsubishi Outlander emits 97 g/mile of CO2 versus 352 g/mile for the Jaguar F-Pace. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.
F-Pace vs Outlander: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Jaguar F-Pace or the Mitsubishi Outlander?
The Jaguar F-Pace is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 29 mpg combined versus 28 mpg for the Mitsubishi Outlander, a 1 mpg advantage and costs about $550 less per year to fuel.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander runs about $2,200 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,750 for the Jaguar F-Pace — a difference of roughly $550 per year.
What engines do the F-Pace and Outlander offer?
Jaguar F-Pace: SIDI, SIDI; Mild Hybrid, 2.0. Mitsubishi Outlander: 2.4, 2.0, PHEV, SIDI & PFI; Mild Hybrid.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
Yes — the EPA classifies both the Jaguar F-Pace and the Mitsubishi Outlander as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they compete directly.
More F-Pace comparisons
More Outlander comparisons
Comparison id: jaguar-f-pace-vs-mitsubishi-outlander