Lexus TX vs Mitsubishi Outlander: Specs Compared

Also searched as Mitsubishi Outlander vs Lexus TX specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.

The Lexus TX is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 29 mpg combined versus 28 mpg for the Mitsubishi Outlander, a 1 mpg advantage and costs about $400 less per year to fuel.

Across 5 measured categories, the Mitsubishi Outlander leads in 3. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.

2024–2026

Lexus TX

Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 10 configurations

29mpg combined (best)
All Lexus TX specs

2015–2027

Mitsubishi Outlander

Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 88 configurations

28mpg combined (best)
All Mitsubishi Outlander specs

Head-to-head specifications

MetricLexus TXMitsubishi Outlander
Best combined MPG29 mpg ✓28 mpg
Best city MPG29 mpg ✓27 mpg
Best highway MPG28 mpg32 mpg ✓
Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year$2,600$2,200 ✓
Lowest CO2 output120 g/mi97 g/mi ✓
Engines offeredSIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; Hybrid, SIDI & PFI; PHEV2.4, 2.0, PHEV, SIDI & PFI; Mild Hybrid
TransmissionsAutomatic (S8), Automatic (S6), Automatic (AV-S6)Automatic (AV-S6), Automatic (A1), Automatic (AV-S8)
DrivetrainsAll-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive4-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Fuel typesPremium, Premium and ElectricityRegular, Regular Gas and Electricity, Premium
EPA classStandard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WDSmall Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
Years covered2024–20262015–2027
Configurations on record1088

Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.

Lexus TX vs Mitsubishi Outlander dimensions and size

The Lexus TX is 17.7 inches longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander on a wheelbase 9.8 inches longer, and 903.9 lbs heavier. At over 200 inches, the larger of the two is past the comfortable limit of a standard 192-inch single garage bay once you allow walking room.

Lexus TX versus Mitsubishi Outlander exterior dimensions
DimensionLexus TX (2026)Mitsubishi Outlander (2026)Difference
Length203.2 in185.4 in17.7 in
Width (excl. mirrors)78.3 in73.2 in5.1 in
Height70.1 in68.9 in1.2 in
Wheelbase116.1 in106.3 in9.8 in
Curb weight4,630 lbs3,726 lbs904 lbs

Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.

Lexus TX vs Mitsubishi Outlander: what the numbers mean

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Mitsubishi Outlander burns about $2,200 of fuel annually against $2,600 for the Lexus TX. That $400 yearly gap compounds to roughly $2,000 over five years and $3,200 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City versus highway split: the Lexus TX is the stronger commuter at 29 mpg city, while the Mitsubishi Outlander pulls ahead on the interstate at 32 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.

Powertrain choice: the Lexus TX is recorded with 3 distinct engine configurations (SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; Hybrid, SIDI & PFI; PHEV), the Mitsubishi Outlander with 4 (2.4, 2.0, PHEV). Across 10 recorded Lexus TX configurations and 88 for the Mitsubishi Outlander, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.

Drivetrain and class: the Lexus TX is offered with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, the Mitsubishi Outlander with 4-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Mitsubishi Outlander emits 97 g/mile of CO2 versus 120 g/mile for the Lexus TX. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.

TX vs Outlander: common questions

Which is better on gas, the Lexus TX or the Mitsubishi Outlander?

The Lexus TX is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 29 mpg combined versus 28 mpg for the Mitsubishi Outlander, a 1 mpg advantage and costs about $400 less per year to fuel.

Which costs less to run per year?

By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Mitsubishi Outlander runs about $2,200 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,600 for the Lexus TX — a difference of roughly $400 per year.

What engines do the TX and Outlander offer?

Lexus TX: SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; Hybrid, SIDI & PFI; PHEV. Mitsubishi Outlander: 2.4, 2.0, PHEV, SIDI & PFI; Mild Hybrid.

Are they in the same vehicle class?

The EPA classifies the Lexus TX as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and the Mitsubishi Outlander as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they aren't a like-for-like match on size.

More TX comparisons

More Outlander comparisons

Comparison id: lexus-tx-vs-mitsubishi-outlander