Honda CR-V vs Kia Telluride: Specs Compared

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Honda CR-V burns about $1,550 of fuel annually against $1,750 for the Kia Telluride. That $200 yearly gap compounds to roughly $1,000 over five years and $1,600 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City and highway economy: the Honda CR-V leads in both cycles — 43 mpg city and 43 mpg highway against 34 and 36 mpg — so its fuel-efficiency advantage holds whether you commute in traffic or cover long highway miles.

Powertrain choice: the Honda CR-V is recorded with 4 distinct engine configurations (SIDI; Hybrid, SIDI, SIDI; Hybrid;), the Kia Telluride with 3 (SIDI & PFI, SIDI; Hybrid, SIDI). Across 44 recorded Honda CR-V configurations and 18 for the Kia Telluride, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.

Drivetrain and class: the Honda CR-V is offered with Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, the Kia Telluride with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Honda CR-V emits 223 g/mile of CO2 versus 251 g/mile for the Kia Telluride. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.