Honda CR-V vs Kia Sportage: Specs Compared

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Kia Sportage burns about $1,450 of fuel annually against $1,550 for the Honda CR-V. That $100 yearly gap compounds to roughly $500 over five years and $800 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City versus highway split: the Honda CR-V is the stronger commuter at 43 mpg city, while the Kia Sportage pulls ahead on the interstate at 44 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.

Powertrain choice: the Honda CR-V is recorded with 4 distinct engine configurations (SIDI; Hybrid, SIDI, SIDI; Hybrid;), the Kia Sportage with 4 (SIDI; PHEV, SIDI & PFI, SIDI; Hybrid). Across 44 recorded Honda CR-V configurations and 69 for the Kia Sportage, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.

Drivetrain and class: the Honda CR-V is offered with Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, the Kia Sportage with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Kia Sportage emits 55 g/mile of CO2 versus 223 g/mile for the Honda CR-V. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.