Kia Sportage vs Lexus TX: Specs Compared

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Kia Sportage burns about $1,450 of fuel annually against $2,600 for the Lexus TX. That $1,150 yearly gap compounds to roughly $5,750 over five years and $9,200 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City and highway economy: the Kia Sportage leads in both cycles — 42 mpg city and 44 mpg highway against 29 and 28 mpg — so its fuel-efficiency advantage holds whether you commute in traffic or cover long highway miles.

Powertrain choice: the Kia Sportage is recorded with 4 distinct engine configurations (SIDI; PHEV, SIDI & PFI, SIDI; Hybrid), the Lexus TX with 3 (SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; Hybrid, SIDI & PFI; PHEV). Across 69 recorded Kia Sportage configurations and 10 for the Lexus TX, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.

Drivetrain and class: the Kia Sportage is offered with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, the Lexus TX with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Kia Sportage emits 55 g/mile of CO2 versus 120 g/mile for the Lexus TX. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.