Kia Telluride vs Toyota Highlander: Specs Compared

Also searched as Toyota Highlander vs Kia Telluride specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.

The Toyota Highlander is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 36 mpg combined versus 35 mpg for the Kia Telluride, a 1 mpg advantage and costs about $50 less per year to fuel.

Across 5 measured categories, the Toyota Highlander leads in 4. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.

2020–2027

Kia Telluride

Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD · 18 configurations

35mpg combined (best)
All Kia Telluride specs

2015–2026

Toyota Highlander

Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 72 configurations

36mpg combined (best)
All Toyota Highlander specs

Head-to-head specifications

MetricKia TellurideToyota Highlander
Best combined MPG35 mpg36 mpg ✓
Best city MPG34 mpg36 mpg ✓
Best highway MPG36 mpg ✓35 mpg
Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year$1,750$1,700 ✓
Lowest CO2 output251 g/mi245 g/mi ✓
Engines offeredSIDI & PFI, SIDI; Hybrid, SIDISIDI & PFI; Hybrid, SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; with Stop-Start, SIDI & PFI; with Stop-start
TransmissionsAutomatic (S8), Automatic (AM-S6)Automatic (AV-S6), Automatic (S8), Automatic (S6)
DrivetrainsAll-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel DriveAll-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Fuel typesRegularRegular
EPA classSmall Sport Utility Vehicle 2WDStandard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
Years covered2020–20272015–2026
Configurations on record1872

Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.

Kia Telluride vs Toyota Highlander dimensions and size

The Kia Telluride is 2 inches longer than the Toyota Highlander on a wheelbase 2 inches longer, and 220.5 lbs heavier. Both clear the roughly 200 inches of usable length in a standard single garage bay.

Kia Telluride versus Toyota Highlander exterior dimensions
DimensionKia Telluride (2026)Toyota Highlander (2026)Difference
Length196.9 in194.9 in2 in
Width (excl. mirrors)78.3 in76 in2.4 in
Height69.3 in68.1 in1.2 in
Wheelbase114.2 in112.2 in2 in
Curb weight4,343 lbs4,123 lbs221 lbs

Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.

Kia Telluride vs Toyota Highlander: what the numbers mean

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Toyota Highlander burns about $1,700 of fuel annually against $1,750 for the Kia Telluride. That $50 yearly gap compounds to roughly $250 over five years and $400 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City versus highway split: the Toyota Highlander is the stronger commuter at 36 mpg city, while the Kia Telluride pulls ahead on the interstate at 36 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.

Powertrain choice: the Kia Telluride is recorded with 3 distinct engine configurations (SIDI & PFI, SIDI; Hybrid, SIDI), the Toyota Highlander with 4 (SIDI & PFI; Hybrid, SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; with Stop-Start). Across 18 recorded Kia Telluride configurations and 72 for the Toyota Highlander, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.

Drivetrain and class: the Kia Telluride is offered with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, the Toyota Highlander with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD and Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Toyota Highlander emits 245 g/mile of CO2 versus 251 g/mile for the Kia Telluride. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.

Telluride vs Highlander: common questions

Which is better on gas, the Kia Telluride or the Toyota Highlander?

The Toyota Highlander is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 36 mpg combined versus 35 mpg for the Kia Telluride, a 1 mpg advantage and costs about $50 less per year to fuel.

Which costs less to run per year?

By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Toyota Highlander runs about $1,700 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $1,750 for the Kia Telluride — a difference of roughly $50 per year.

What engines do the Telluride and Highlander offer?

Kia Telluride: SIDI & PFI, SIDI; Hybrid, SIDI. Toyota Highlander: SIDI & PFI; Hybrid, SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; with Stop-Start, SIDI & PFI; with Stop-start.

Are they in the same vehicle class?

The EPA classifies the Kia Telluride as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD and the Toyota Highlander as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they aren't a like-for-like match on size.

More Telluride comparisons

More Highlander comparisons

Comparison id: kia-telluride-vs-toyota-highlander