Kia Telluride vs Toyota Grand Highlander: Specs Compared

Also searched as Toyota Grand Highlander vs Kia Telluride specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.

The Toyota Grand Highlander is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 36 mpg combined versus 35 mpg for the Kia Telluride, a 1 mpg advantage and costs about $50 less per year to fuel.

Across 5 measured categories, the Toyota Grand Highlander leads in 4. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.

2020–2027

Kia Telluride

Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD · 18 configurations

35mpg combined (best)
All Kia Telluride specs

2024–2026

Toyota Grand Highlander

Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 22 configurations

36mpg combined (best)
All Toyota Grand Highlander specs

Head-to-head specifications

MetricKia TellurideToyota Grand Highlander
Best combined MPG35 mpg36 mpg ✓
Best city MPG34 mpg37 mpg ✓
Best highway MPG36 mpg ✓34 mpg
Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year$1,750$1,700 ✓
Lowest CO2 output251 g/mi246 g/mi ✓
Engines offeredSIDI & PFI, SIDI; Hybrid, SIDISIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; Hybrid
TransmissionsAutomatic (S8), Automatic (AM-S6)Automatic (S8), Automatic (S6), Automatic (AV-S6)
DrivetrainsAll-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel DriveAll-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Fuel typesRegularRegular
EPA classSmall Sport Utility Vehicle 2WDStandard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
Years covered2020–20272024–2026
Configurations on record1822

Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.

Kia Telluride vs Toyota Grand Highlander dimensions and size

The Toyota Grand Highlander is 4.3 inches longer than the Kia Telluride on a wheelbase 2 inches longer, and 121.3 lbs heavier. At over 200 inches, the larger of the two is past the comfortable limit of a standard 192-inch single garage bay once you allow walking room.

Kia Telluride versus Toyota Grand Highlander exterior dimensions
DimensionKia Telluride (2026)Toyota Grand Highlander (2026)Difference
Length196.9 in201.2 in4.3 in
Width (excl. mirrors)78.3 in78.3 inidentical
Height69.3 in70.1 in0.8 in
Wheelbase114.2 in116.1 in2 in
Curb weight4,343 lbs4,464 lbs121 lbs

Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.

Kia Telluride vs Toyota Grand Highlander: what the numbers mean

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Toyota Grand Highlander burns about $1,700 of fuel annually against $1,750 for the Kia Telluride. That $50 yearly gap compounds to roughly $250 over five years and $400 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City versus highway split: the Toyota Grand Highlander is the stronger commuter at 37 mpg city, while the Kia Telluride pulls ahead on the interstate at 36 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.

Powertrain choice: the Kia Telluride is recorded with 3 distinct engine configurations (SIDI & PFI, SIDI; Hybrid, SIDI), the Toyota Grand Highlander with 2 (SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; Hybrid). Across 18 recorded Kia Telluride configurations and 22 for the Toyota Grand Highlander, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.

Drivetrain and class: the Kia Telluride is offered with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, the Toyota Grand Highlander with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD and Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Toyota Grand Highlander emits 246 g/mile of CO2 versus 251 g/mile for the Kia Telluride. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.

Telluride vs Grand Highlander: common questions

Which is better on gas, the Kia Telluride or the Toyota Grand Highlander?

The Toyota Grand Highlander is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 36 mpg combined versus 35 mpg for the Kia Telluride, a 1 mpg advantage and costs about $50 less per year to fuel.

Which costs less to run per year?

By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Toyota Grand Highlander runs about $1,700 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $1,750 for the Kia Telluride — a difference of roughly $50 per year.

What engines do the Telluride and Grand Highlander offer?

Kia Telluride: SIDI & PFI, SIDI; Hybrid, SIDI. Toyota Grand Highlander: SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; Hybrid.

Are they in the same vehicle class?

The EPA classifies the Kia Telluride as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD and the Toyota Grand Highlander as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they aren't a like-for-like match on size.

More Telluride comparisons

More Grand Highlander comparisons

Comparison id: kia-telluride-vs-toyota-grand-highlander