Mazda CX-9 vs Volkswagen Atlas: Specs Compared

Also searched as Volkswagen Atlas vs Mazda CX-9 specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.

The Volkswagen Atlas is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 25 mpg combined versus 24 mpg for the Mazda CX-9, a 1 mpg advantage and costs about $100 less per year to fuel.

Across 4 measured categories, the Volkswagen Atlas leads in 3. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.

2015–2023

Mazda CX-9

Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 16 configurations

24mpg combined (best)
All Mazda CX-9 specs

2018–2027

Volkswagen Atlas

Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 57 configurations

25mpg combined (best)
All Volkswagen Atlas specs

Head-to-head specifications

MetricMazda CX-9Volkswagen Atlas
Best combined MPG24 mpg25 mpg ✓
Best city MPG22 mpg22 mpg
Best highway MPG28 mpg29 mpg ✓
Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year$2,550$2,450 ✓
Lowest CO2 output362 g/mi ✓364 g/mi
Engines offeredSIDI, 3.7SIDI
TransmissionsAutomatic (S6)Automatic (S8)
Drivetrains4-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel DriveAll-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Fuel typesRegularRegular
EPA classSmall Sport Utility Vehicle 4WDSmall Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
Years covered2015–20232018–2027
Configurations on record1657

Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.

Mazda CX-9 vs Volkswagen Atlas dimensions and size

The Volkswagen Atlas is 1.2 inches longer than the Mazda CX-9 on a wheelbase 2 inches longer, and 55.1 lbs heavier. At over 200 inches, the larger of the two is past the comfortable limit of a standard 192-inch single garage bay once you allow walking room.

Mazda CX-9 versus Volkswagen Atlas exterior dimensions
DimensionMazda CX-9 (2023)Volkswagen Atlas (2026)Difference
Length199.6 in200.8 in1.2 in
Width (excl. mirrors)77.6 in78 in0.4 in
Height67.7 in68.9 in1.2 in
Wheelbase115.4 in117.3 in2 in
Curb weight4,387 lbs4,442 lbs55 lbs

Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.

Mazda CX-9 vs Volkswagen Atlas: what the numbers mean

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Volkswagen Atlas burns about $2,450 of fuel annually against $2,550 for the Mazda CX-9. That $100 yearly gap compounds to roughly $500 over five years and $800 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City and highway economy: the Volkswagen Atlas leads in both cycles — 22 mpg city and 29 mpg highway against 22 and 28 mpg — so its fuel-efficiency advantage holds whether you commute in traffic or cover long highway miles.

Powertrain choice: the Mazda CX-9 is recorded with 2 distinct engine configurations (SIDI, 3.7), the Volkswagen Atlas with 1 (SIDI). Across 16 recorded Mazda CX-9 configurations and 57 for the Volkswagen Atlas, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.

Drivetrain and class: the Mazda CX-9 is offered with 4-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, the Volkswagen Atlas with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Mazda CX-9 emits 362 g/mile of CO2 versus 364 g/mile for the Volkswagen Atlas. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.

CX-9 vs Atlas: common questions

Which is better on gas, the Mazda CX-9 or the Volkswagen Atlas?

The Volkswagen Atlas is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 25 mpg combined versus 24 mpg for the Mazda CX-9, a 1 mpg advantage and costs about $100 less per year to fuel.

Which costs less to run per year?

By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Volkswagen Atlas runs about $2,450 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,550 for the Mazda CX-9 — a difference of roughly $100 per year.

What engines do the CX-9 and Atlas offer?

Mazda CX-9: SIDI, 3.7. Volkswagen Atlas: SIDI.

Are they in the same vehicle class?

Yes — the EPA classifies both the Mazda CX-9 and the Volkswagen Atlas as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they compete directly.

More CX-9 comparisons

More Atlas comparisons

Comparison id: mazda-cx-9-vs-volkswagen-atlas