Mazda CX-9 vs Toyota Land Cruiser: Specs Compared

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Mazda CX-9 burns about $2,550 of fuel annually against $3,300 for the Toyota Land Cruiser. That $750 yearly gap compounds to roughly $3,750 over five years and $6,000 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City versus highway split: the Toyota Land Cruiser is the stronger commuter at 22 mpg city, while the Mazda CX-9 pulls ahead on the interstate at 28 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.

Powertrain choice: the Mazda CX-9 is recorded with 2 distinct engine configurations (SIDI, 3.7), the Toyota Land Cruiser with 2 (SIDI & PFI; Hybrid, 5.7). Across 16 recorded Mazda CX-9 configurations and 11 for the Toyota Land Cruiser, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.

Drivetrain and class: the Mazda CX-9 is offered with 4-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, the Toyota Land Cruiser with 4-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Mazda CX-9 emits 362 g/mile of CO2 versus 379 g/mile for the Toyota Land Cruiser. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.