Lucid Air vs Polestar 2: Specs Compared
Also searched as Polestar 2 vs Lucid Air specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.
The Lucid Air is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 146 mpg combined versus 115 mpg for the Polestar 2, a 31 mpg advantage and costs about $150 less per year to fuel.
Across 4 measured categories, the Lucid Air leads in 4. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Lucid Air | Polestar 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 146 mpg ✓ | 115 mpg |
| Best city MPG | 149 mpg ✓ | 124 mpg |
| Best highway MPG | 142 mpg ✓ | 106 mpg |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $500 ✓ | $650 |
| Lowest CO2 output | Not available | Not available |
| Engines offered | Not available | Not available |
| Transmissions | Automatic (A1) | Automatic (A1) |
| Drivetrains | All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive | All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Electricity | Electricity |
| EPA class | Large Cars | Midsize Cars |
| Years covered | 2022–2026 | 2021–2025 |
| Configurations on record | 41 | 17 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Lucid Air vs Polestar 2: what the numbers mean
Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Lucid Air burns about $500 of fuel annually against $650 for the Polestar 2. That $150 yearly gap compounds to roughly $750 over five years and $1,200 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.
City and highway economy: the Lucid Air leads in both cycles — 149 mpg city and 142 mpg highway against 124 and 106 mpg — so its fuel-efficiency advantage holds whether you commute in traffic or cover long highway miles.
Drivetrain and class: the Lucid Air is offered with All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, the Polestar 2 with All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Large Cars and Midsize Cars respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.
Air vs 2: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Lucid Air or the Polestar 2?
The Lucid Air is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 146 mpg combined versus 115 mpg for the Polestar 2, a 31 mpg advantage and costs about $150 less per year to fuel.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Lucid Air runs about $500 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $650 for the Polestar 2 — a difference of roughly $150 per year.
What engines do the Air and 2 offer?
Lucid Air: no engine data on record. Polestar 2: no engine data on record.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
The EPA classifies the Lucid Air as Large Cars and the Polestar 2 as Midsize Cars, so they aren't a like-for-like match on size.
More Air comparisons
More 2 comparisons
Comparison id: lucid-air-vs-polestar-2