Mercedes-Benz EQE vs Polestar 2: Specs Compared
Also searched as Polestar 2 vs Mercedes-Benz EQE specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.
The Polestar 2 is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 115 mpg combined versus 96 mpg for the Mercedes-Benz EQE, a 19 mpg advantage and costs about $150 less per year to fuel.
Across 4 measured categories, the Polestar 2 leads in 4. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2024–2027
Mercedes-Benz EQE
Midsize Cars · 23 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Mercedes-Benz EQE | Polestar 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 96 mpg | 115 mpg ✓ |
| Best city MPG | 99 mpg | 124 mpg ✓ |
| Best highway MPG | 96 mpg | 106 mpg ✓ |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $800 | $650 ✓ |
| Lowest CO2 output | Not available | Not available |
| Engines offered | Not available | Not available |
| Transmissions | Automatic (A1) | Automatic (A1) |
| Drivetrains | Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Electricity | Electricity |
| EPA class | Midsize Cars | Midsize Cars |
| Years covered | 2024–2027 | 2021–2025 |
| Configurations on record | 23 | 17 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Mercedes-Benz EQE vs Polestar 2: what the numbers mean
Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Polestar 2 burns about $650 of fuel annually against $800 for the Mercedes-Benz EQE. That $150 yearly gap compounds to roughly $750 over five years and $1,200 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.
City and highway economy: the Polestar 2 leads in both cycles — 124 mpg city and 106 mpg highway against 99 and 96 mpg — so its fuel-efficiency advantage holds whether you commute in traffic or cover long highway miles.
Drivetrain and class: the Mercedes-Benz EQE is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, the Polestar 2 with All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Midsize Cars and Midsize Cars respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.
EQE vs 2: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Mercedes-Benz EQE or the Polestar 2?
The Polestar 2 is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 115 mpg combined versus 96 mpg for the Mercedes-Benz EQE, a 19 mpg advantage and costs about $150 less per year to fuel.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Polestar 2 runs about $650 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $800 for the Mercedes-Benz EQE — a difference of roughly $150 per year.
What engines do the EQE and 2 offer?
Mercedes-Benz EQE: no engine data on record. Polestar 2: no engine data on record.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
Yes — the EPA classifies both the Mercedes-Benz EQE and the Polestar 2 as Midsize Cars, so they compete directly.
More EQE comparisons
More 2 comparisons
Comparison id: mercedes-benz-eqe-vs-polestar-2