Mercedes-Benz EQE vs Toyota Mirai: Specs Compared
Also searched as Toyota Mirai vs Mercedes-Benz EQE specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.
The Mercedes-Benz EQE is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 96 mpg combined versus 74 mpg for the Toyota Mirai, a 22 mpg advantage.
Across 3 measured categories, the Mercedes-Benz EQE leads in 3. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2024–2027
Mercedes-Benz EQE
Midsize Cars · 23 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Mercedes-Benz EQE | Toyota Mirai |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 96 mpg ✓ | 74 mpg |
| Best city MPG | 99 mpg ✓ | 76 mpg |
| Best highway MPG | 96 mpg ✓ | 71 mpg |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $800 | Not available |
| Lowest CO2 output | Not available | Not available |
| Engines offered | Not available | PEFC |
| Transmissions | Automatic (A1) | Automatic (variable gear ratios) |
| Drivetrains | Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Electricity | Hydrogen |
| EPA class | Midsize Cars | Compact Cars |
| Years covered | 2024–2027 | 2016–2026 |
| Configurations on record | 23 | 17 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Mercedes-Benz EQE vs Toyota Mirai dimensions and size
The Toyota Mirai is 0.8 inches longer than the Mercedes-Benz EQE on a wheelbase 7.9 inches shorter, and 1,201.5 lbs lighter. Both clear the roughly 200 inches of usable length in a standard single garage bay.
| Dimension | Mercedes-Benz EQE (2026) | Toyota Mirai (2026) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 194.9 in | 195.7 in | 0.8 in |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 77.2 in | 74 in | 3.1 in |
| Height | 59.4 in | 57.9 in | 1.6 in |
| Wheelbase | 122.8 in | 115 in | 7.9 in |
| Curb weight | 5,456 lbs | 4,255 lbs | 1,202 lbs |
Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.
Mercedes-Benz EQE vs Toyota Mirai: what the numbers mean
City and highway economy: the Mercedes-Benz EQE leads in both cycles — 99 mpg city and 96 mpg highway against 76 and 71 mpg — so its fuel-efficiency advantage holds whether you commute in traffic or cover long highway miles.
Powertrain choice: the Mercedes-Benz EQE is recorded with no distinct engine configurations, the Toyota Mirai with 1 (PEFC). Across 23 recorded Mercedes-Benz EQE configurations and 17 for the Toyota Mirai, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.
Drivetrain and class: the Mercedes-Benz EQE is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, the Toyota Mirai with Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Midsize Cars and Compact Cars respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.
EQE vs Mirai: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Mercedes-Benz EQE or the Toyota Mirai?
The Mercedes-Benz EQE is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 96 mpg combined versus 74 mpg for the Toyota Mirai, a 22 mpg advantage.
What engines do the EQE and Mirai offer?
Mercedes-Benz EQE: no engine data on record. Toyota Mirai: PEFC.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
The EPA classifies the Mercedes-Benz EQE as Midsize Cars and the Toyota Mirai as Compact Cars, so they aren't a like-for-like match on size.
More EQE comparisons
More Mirai comparisons
Comparison id: mercedes-benz-eqe-vs-toyota-mirai