Kia Telluride vs Volkswagen Taos: Specs Compared
Also searched as Volkswagen Taos vs Kia Telluride specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.
The Kia Telluride is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 35 mpg combined versus 31 mpg for the Volkswagen Taos, a 4 mpg advantage and costs about $250 less per year to fuel.
Across 4 measured categories, the Kia Telluride leads in 4. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2020–2027
Kia Telluride
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD · 18 configurations
2022–2027
Volkswagen Taos
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD · 12 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Kia Telluride | Volkswagen Taos |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 35 mpg ✓ | 31 mpg |
| Best city MPG | 34 mpg ✓ | 28 mpg |
| Best highway MPG | 36 mpg | 36 mpg |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $1,750 ✓ | $2,000 |
| Lowest CO2 output | 251 g/mi ✓ | 286 g/mi |
| Engines offered | SIDI & PFI, SIDI; Hybrid, SIDI | SIDI |
| Transmissions | Automatic (S8), Automatic (AM-S6) | Automatic (S8), Automatic (AM-S7), Automatic 7-spd |
| Drivetrains | All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Regular | Regular |
| EPA class | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD |
| Years covered | 2020–2027 | 2022–2027 |
| Configurations on record | 18 | 12 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Kia Telluride vs Volkswagen Taos dimensions and size
The Kia Telluride is 20.9 inches longer than the Volkswagen Taos on a wheelbase 8.3 inches longer, and 912.7 lbs heavier. Both clear the roughly 200 inches of usable length in a standard single garage bay.
| Dimension | Kia Telluride (2026) | Volkswagen Taos (2026) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 196.9 in | 176 in | 20.9 in |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 78.3 in | 72.8 in | 5.5 in |
| Height | 69.3 in | 64.6 in | 4.7 in |
| Wheelbase | 114.2 in | 105.9 in | 8.3 in |
| Curb weight | 4,343 lbs | 3,430 lbs | 913 lbs |
Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.
Kia Telluride vs Volkswagen Taos: what the numbers mean
Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Kia Telluride burns about $1,750 of fuel annually against $2,000 for the Volkswagen Taos. That $250 yearly gap compounds to roughly $1,250 over five years and $2,000 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.
City versus highway split: the Kia Telluride is the stronger commuter at 34 mpg city, while the Volkswagen Taos pulls ahead on the interstate at 36 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.
Powertrain choice: the Kia Telluride is recorded with 3 distinct engine configurations (SIDI & PFI, SIDI; Hybrid, SIDI), the Volkswagen Taos with 1 (SIDI). Across 18 recorded Kia Telluride configurations and 12 for the Volkswagen Taos, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.
Drivetrain and class: the Kia Telluride is offered with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, the Volkswagen Taos with Front-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.
Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Kia Telluride emits 251 g/mile of CO2 versus 286 g/mile for the Volkswagen Taos. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.
Telluride vs Taos: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Kia Telluride or the Volkswagen Taos?
The Kia Telluride is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 35 mpg combined versus 31 mpg for the Volkswagen Taos, a 4 mpg advantage and costs about $250 less per year to fuel.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Kia Telluride runs about $1,750 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,000 for the Volkswagen Taos — a difference of roughly $250 per year.
What engines do the Telluride and Taos offer?
Kia Telluride: SIDI & PFI, SIDI; Hybrid, SIDI. Volkswagen Taos: SIDI.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
Yes — the EPA classifies both the Kia Telluride and the Volkswagen Taos as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD, so they compete directly.
More Telluride comparisons
More Taos comparisons
Comparison id: kia-telluride-vs-volkswagen-taos