Ford Mustang vs Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class: Specs Compared
Also searched as Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class vs Ford Mustang specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.
The Ford Mustang and Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class are evenly matched on fuel economy — both peak at 26 mpg combined — so the decision comes down to engine choice, drivetrain, and class.
Across 4 measured categories, the Ford Mustang leads in 2. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2015–2026
Ford Mustang
Subcompact Cars · 133 configurations
2015–2023
Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class
Compact Cars · 27 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Ford Mustang | Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 26 mpg | 26 mpg |
| Best city MPG | 22 mpg | 24 mpg ✓ |
| Best highway MPG | 33 mpg ✓ | 31 mpg |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $2,350 ✓ | $2,900 |
| Lowest CO2 output | 341 g/mi | 334 g/mi ✓ |
| Engines offered | 5.2, 5.0, SIDI & PFI, with Stop-Start | SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI |
| Transmissions | Automatic (AM-S8), Manual 6-spd, Automatic (S10) | Automatic 9-spd, Automatic 7-spd |
| Drivetrains | Rear-Wheel Drive | All-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Premium, Regular | Premium |
| EPA class | Subcompact Cars | Compact Cars |
| Years covered | 2015–2026 | 2015–2023 |
| Configurations on record | 133 | 27 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Ford Mustang vs Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class dimensions and size
The Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class is 5.1 inches longer than the Ford Mustang on a wheelbase 5.9 inches longer, and 328.5 lbs heavier. Both clear the roughly 200 inches of usable length in a standard single garage bay.
| Dimension | Ford Mustang (2026) | Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class (2018) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 189.4 in | 194.5 in | 5.1 in |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 75.6 in | 74 in | 1.6 in |
| Height | 55.1 in | 55.9 in | 0.8 in |
| Wheelbase | 107.1 in | 113 in | 5.9 in |
| Curb weight | 3,948 lbs | 4,277 lbs | 329 lbs |
Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.
Ford Mustang vs Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class: what the numbers mean
Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Ford Mustang burns about $2,350 of fuel annually against $2,900 for the Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class. That $550 yearly gap compounds to roughly $2,750 over five years and $4,400 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.
City versus highway split: the Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class is the stronger commuter at 24 mpg city, while the Ford Mustang pulls ahead on the interstate at 33 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.
Powertrain choice: the Ford Mustang is recorded with 4 distinct engine configurations (5.2, 5.0, SIDI & PFI), the Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class with 2 (SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI). Across 133 recorded Ford Mustang configurations and 27 for the Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.
Drivetrain and class: the Ford Mustang is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive, the Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class with All-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Subcompact Cars and Compact Cars respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.
Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class emits 334 g/mile of CO2 versus 341 g/mile for the Ford Mustang. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.
Mustang vs CLS-Class: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Ford Mustang or the Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class?
The Ford Mustang and Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class are evenly matched on fuel economy — both peak at 26 mpg combined — so the decision comes down to engine choice, drivetrain, and class.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Ford Mustang runs about $2,350 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,900 for the Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class — a difference of roughly $550 per year.
What engines do the Mustang and CLS-Class offer?
Ford Mustang: 5.2, 5.0, SIDI & PFI, with Stop-Start. Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class: SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
The EPA classifies the Ford Mustang as Subcompact Cars and the Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class as Compact Cars, so they aren't a like-for-like match on size.
More Mustang comparisons
More CLS-Class comparisons
Comparison id: ford-mustang-vs-mercedes-benz-cls-class