Ford Mustang vs Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class: Specs Compared

Also searched as Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class vs Ford Mustang specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.

The Ford Mustang and Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class are evenly matched on fuel economy — both peak at 26 mpg combined — so the decision comes down to engine choice, drivetrain, and class.

Across 4 measured categories, the Ford Mustang leads in 2. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.

2015–2026

Ford Mustang

Subcompact Cars · 133 configurations

26mpg combined (best)
All Ford Mustang specs

2015–2023

Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class

Compact Cars · 27 configurations

26mpg combined (best)
All Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class specs

Head-to-head specifications

MetricFord MustangMercedes-Benz CLS-Class
Best combined MPG26 mpg26 mpg
Best city MPG22 mpg24 mpg ✓
Best highway MPG33 mpg ✓31 mpg
Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year$2,350 ✓$2,900
Lowest CO2 output341 g/mi334 g/mi ✓
Engines offered5.2, 5.0, SIDI & PFI, with Stop-StartSIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI
TransmissionsAutomatic (AM-S8), Manual 6-spd, Automatic (S10)Automatic 9-spd, Automatic 7-spd
DrivetrainsRear-Wheel DriveAll-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Fuel typesPremium, RegularPremium
EPA classSubcompact CarsCompact Cars
Years covered2015–20262015–2023
Configurations on record13327

Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.

Ford Mustang vs Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class dimensions and size

The Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class is 5.1 inches longer than the Ford Mustang on a wheelbase 5.9 inches longer, and 328.5 lbs heavier. Both clear the roughly 200 inches of usable length in a standard single garage bay.

Ford Mustang versus Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class exterior dimensions
DimensionFord Mustang (2026)Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class (2018)Difference
Length189.4 in194.5 in5.1 in
Width (excl. mirrors)75.6 in74 in1.6 in
Height55.1 in55.9 in0.8 in
Wheelbase107.1 in113 in5.9 in
Curb weight3,948 lbs4,277 lbs329 lbs

Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.

Ford Mustang vs Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class: what the numbers mean

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Ford Mustang burns about $2,350 of fuel annually against $2,900 for the Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class. That $550 yearly gap compounds to roughly $2,750 over five years and $4,400 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City versus highway split: the Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class is the stronger commuter at 24 mpg city, while the Ford Mustang pulls ahead on the interstate at 33 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.

Powertrain choice: the Ford Mustang is recorded with 4 distinct engine configurations (5.2, 5.0, SIDI & PFI), the Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class with 2 (SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI). Across 133 recorded Ford Mustang configurations and 27 for the Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.

Drivetrain and class: the Ford Mustang is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive, the Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class with All-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Subcompact Cars and Compact Cars respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class emits 334 g/mile of CO2 versus 341 g/mile for the Ford Mustang. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.

Mustang vs CLS-Class: common questions

Which is better on gas, the Ford Mustang or the Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class?

The Ford Mustang and Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class are evenly matched on fuel economy — both peak at 26 mpg combined — so the decision comes down to engine choice, drivetrain, and class.

Which costs less to run per year?

By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Ford Mustang runs about $2,350 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,900 for the Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class — a difference of roughly $550 per year.

What engines do the Mustang and CLS-Class offer?

Ford Mustang: 5.2, 5.0, SIDI & PFI, with Stop-Start. Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class: SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI.

Are they in the same vehicle class?

The EPA classifies the Ford Mustang as Subcompact Cars and the Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class as Compact Cars, so they aren't a like-for-like match on size.

More Mustang comparisons

More CLS-Class comparisons

Comparison id: ford-mustang-vs-mercedes-benz-cls-class