Ford Escape vs Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class: Specs Compared
Also searched as Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class vs Ford Escape specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.
The Ford Escape is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 41 mpg combined versus 29 mpg for the Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class, a 12 mpg advantage and costs about $1,100 less per year to fuel.
Across 5 measured categories, the Ford Escape leads in 5. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2015–2026
Ford Escape
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD · 68 configurations
2015–2026
Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 43 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Ford Escape | Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 41 mpg ✓ | 29 mpg |
| Best city MPG | 44 mpg ✓ | 26 mpg |
| Best highway MPG | 38 mpg ✓ | 34 mpg |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $1,500 ✓ | $2,600 |
| Lowest CO2 output | 52 g/mi ✓ | 306 g/mi |
| Engines offered | Hybrid, SIDI & PFI, PHEV, SIDI | SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI, SIDI; FFV |
| Transmissions | Automatic (variable gear ratios), Automatic 8-spd, Automatic (S8) | Automatic (AM8), Automatic (AM7) |
| Drivetrains | Part-time 4-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive | All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Regular, Regular Gas and Electricity, Gasoline or E85 | Premium, Premium or E85 |
| EPA class | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Years covered | 2015–2026 | 2015–2026 |
| Configurations on record | 68 | 43 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Ford Escape vs Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class dimensions and size
The Ford Escape is 6.3 inches longer than the Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class on a wheelbase 0.8 inches shorter, and 449.7 lbs lighter. Both clear the roughly 200 inches of usable length in a standard single garage bay.
| Dimension | Ford Escape (2026) | Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class (2026) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 180.7 in | 174.4 in | 6.3 in |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 74 in | 72 in | 2 in |
| Height | 66.1 in | 62.6 in | 3.5 in |
| Wheelbase | 106.7 in | 107.5 in | 0.8 in |
| Curb weight | 3,419 lbs | 3,869 lbs | 450 lbs |
Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.
Ford Escape vs Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class: what the numbers mean
Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Ford Escape burns about $1,500 of fuel annually against $2,600 for the Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class. That $1,100 yearly gap compounds to roughly $5,500 over five years and $8,800 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.
City and highway economy: the Ford Escape leads in both cycles — 44 mpg city and 38 mpg highway against 26 and 34 mpg — so its fuel-efficiency advantage holds whether you commute in traffic or cover long highway miles.
Powertrain choice: the Ford Escape is recorded with 4 distinct engine configurations (Hybrid, SIDI & PFI, PHEV), the Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class with 3 (SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI, SIDI; FFV). Across 68 recorded Ford Escape configurations and 43 for the Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.
Drivetrain and class: the Ford Escape is offered with Part-time 4-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, the Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.
Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Ford Escape emits 52 g/mile of CO2 versus 306 g/mile for the Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.
Escape vs GLA-Class: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Ford Escape or the Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class?
The Ford Escape is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 41 mpg combined versus 29 mpg for the Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class, a 12 mpg advantage and costs about $1,100 less per year to fuel.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Ford Escape runs about $1,500 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,600 for the Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class — a difference of roughly $1,100 per year.
What engines do the Escape and GLA-Class offer?
Ford Escape: Hybrid, SIDI & PFI, PHEV, SIDI. Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class: SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI, SIDI; FFV.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
The EPA classifies the Ford Escape as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD and the Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they aren't a like-for-like match on size.
More Escape comparisons
More GLA-Class comparisons
Comparison id: ford-escape-vs-mercedes-benz-gla-class