Kia Stinger vs Nissan GT-R: Specs Compared

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Kia Stinger burns about $3,050 of fuel annually against $4,000 for the Nissan GT-R. That $950 yearly gap compounds to roughly $4,750 over five years and $7,600 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City and highway economy: the Kia Stinger leads in both cycles — 22 mpg city and 32 mpg highway against 16 and 23 mpg — so its fuel-efficiency advantage holds whether you commute in traffic or cover long highway miles.

Powertrain choice: the Kia Stinger is recorded with 2 distinct engine configurations (SIDI, SIDI & PFI), the Nissan GT-R with 1 (3.8). Across 24 recorded Kia Stinger configurations and 9 for the Nissan GT-R, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.

Drivetrain and class: the Kia Stinger is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, the Nissan GT-R with All-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Midsize Cars and Subcompact Cars respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Kia Stinger emits 355 g/mile of CO2 versus 472 g/mile for the Nissan GT-R. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.