Dodge Durango vs Ford Bronco: Specs Compared

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Dodge Durango burns about $2,950 of fuel annually against $2,950 for the Ford Bronco. That $0 yearly gap compounds to roughly $0 over five years and $0 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City versus highway split: the Ford Bronco is the stronger commuter at 20 mpg city, while the Dodge Durango pulls ahead on the interstate at 26 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.

Powertrain choice: the Dodge Durango is recorded with 4 distinct engine configurations (6.4, 6.2, 5.7), the Ford Bronco with 2 (SIDI & PFI, SIDI). Across 65 recorded Dodge Durango configurations and 66 for the Ford Bronco, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.

Drivetrain and class: the Dodge Durango is offered with All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive, the Ford Bronco with Part-time 4-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Dodge Durango emits 414 g/mile of CO2 versus 424 g/mile for the Ford Bronco. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.