BMW iX vs Volvo EX30: Specs Compared

Also searched as Volvo EX30 vs BMW iX specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.

The Volvo EX30 is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 116 mpg combined versus 97 mpg for the BMW iX, a 19 mpg advantage and costs about $150 less per year to fuel.

Across 4 measured categories, the Volvo EX30 leads in 4. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.

2022–2026

BMW iX

Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 35 configurations

97mpg combined (best)
All BMW iX specs

2025–2026

Volvo EX30

Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 8 configurations

116mpg combined (best)
All Volvo EX30 specs

Head-to-head specifications

MetricBMW iXVolvo EX30
Best combined MPG97 mpg116 mpg ✓
Best city MPG99 mpg127 mpg ✓
Best highway MPG94 mpg104 mpg ✓
Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year$800$650 ✓
Lowest CO2 outputNot availableNot available
Engines offeredNot availableNot available
TransmissionsAutomatic (A1)Automatic (A1)
DrivetrainsAll-Wheel DriveAll-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Fuel typesElectricityElectricity
EPA classStandard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WDSmall Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
Years covered2022–20262025–2026
Configurations on record358

Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.

BMW iX vs Volvo EX30 dimensions and size

The BMW iX is 28.3 inches longer than the Volvo EX30 on a wheelbase 13.8 inches longer, and 1,653.5 lbs heavier. Both clear the roughly 200 inches of usable length in a standard single garage bay.

BMW iX versus Volvo EX30 exterior dimensions
DimensionBMW iX (2026)Volvo EX30 (2026)Difference
Length194.9 in166.5 in28.3 in
Width (excl. mirrors)77.2 in72.4 in4.7 in
Height66.5 in61 in5.5 in
Wheelbase118.1 in104.3 in13.8 in
Curb weight5,688 lbs4,034 lbs1,654 lbs

Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.

BMW iX vs Volvo EX30: what the numbers mean

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Volvo EX30 burns about $650 of fuel annually against $800 for the BMW iX. That $150 yearly gap compounds to roughly $750 over five years and $1,200 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City and highway economy: the Volvo EX30 leads in both cycles — 127 mpg city and 104 mpg highway against 99 and 94 mpg — so its fuel-efficiency advantage holds whether you commute in traffic or cover long highway miles.

Drivetrain and class: the BMW iX is offered with All-Wheel Drive, the Volvo EX30 with All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

iX vs EX30: common questions

Which is better on gas, the BMW iX or the Volvo EX30?

The Volvo EX30 is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 116 mpg combined versus 97 mpg for the BMW iX, a 19 mpg advantage and costs about $150 less per year to fuel.

Which costs less to run per year?

By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Volvo EX30 runs about $650 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $800 for the BMW iX — a difference of roughly $150 per year.

What engines do the iX and EX30 offer?

BMW iX: no engine data on record. Volvo EX30: no engine data on record.

Are they in the same vehicle class?

The EPA classifies the BMW iX as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and the Volvo EX30 as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they aren't a like-for-like match on size.

More iX comparisons

More EX30 comparisons

Comparison id: bmw-ix-vs-volvo-ex30