BMW iX vs Lucid Gravity: Specs Compared

Also searched as Lucid Gravity vs BMW iX specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.

The Lucid Gravity is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 111 mpg combined versus 97 mpg for the BMW iX, a 14 mpg advantage and costs about $100 less per year to fuel.

Across 4 measured categories, the Lucid Gravity leads in 4. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.

2022–2026

BMW iX

Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 35 configurations

97mpg combined (best)
All BMW iX specs

2025–2027

Lucid Gravity

Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 23 configurations

111mpg combined (best)
All Lucid Gravity specs

Head-to-head specifications

MetricBMW iXLucid Gravity
Best combined MPG97 mpg111 mpg ✓
Best city MPG99 mpg115 mpg ✓
Best highway MPG94 mpg106 mpg ✓
Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year$800$700 ✓
Lowest CO2 outputNot availableNot available
Engines offeredNot availableNot available
TransmissionsAutomatic (A1)Automatic (A1)
DrivetrainsAll-Wheel DriveAll-Wheel Drive
Fuel typesElectricityElectricity
EPA classStandard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WDStandard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
Years covered2022–20262025–2027
Configurations on record3523

Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.

BMW iX vs Lucid Gravity dimensions and size

The Lucid Gravity is 3.1 inches longer than the BMW iX on a wheelbase 0.8 inches longer, and 6.6 lbs lighter. Both clear the roughly 200 inches of usable length in a standard single garage bay.

BMW iX versus Lucid Gravity exterior dimensions
DimensionBMW iX (2026)Lucid Gravity (2026)Difference
Length194.9 in198 in3.1 in
Width (excl. mirrors)77.2 in78.7 in1.6 in
Height66.5 in65.4 in1.2 in
Wheelbase118.1 in118.9 in0.8 in
Curb weight5,688 lbs5,681 lbs7 lbs

Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.

BMW iX vs Lucid Gravity: what the numbers mean

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Lucid Gravity burns about $700 of fuel annually against $800 for the BMW iX. That $100 yearly gap compounds to roughly $500 over five years and $800 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City and highway economy: the Lucid Gravity leads in both cycles — 115 mpg city and 106 mpg highway against 99 and 94 mpg — so its fuel-efficiency advantage holds whether you commute in traffic or cover long highway miles.

Drivetrain and class: the BMW iX is offered with All-Wheel Drive, the Lucid Gravity with All-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

iX vs Gravity: common questions

Which is better on gas, the BMW iX or the Lucid Gravity?

The Lucid Gravity is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 111 mpg combined versus 97 mpg for the BMW iX, a 14 mpg advantage and costs about $100 less per year to fuel.

Which costs less to run per year?

By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Lucid Gravity runs about $700 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $800 for the BMW iX — a difference of roughly $100 per year.

What engines do the iX and Gravity offer?

BMW iX: no engine data on record. Lucid Gravity: no engine data on record.

Are they in the same vehicle class?

Yes — the EPA classifies both the BMW iX and the Lucid Gravity as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they compete directly.

More iX comparisons

More Gravity comparisons

Comparison id: bmw-ix-vs-lucid-gravity