Lucid Gravity vs Maserati Grecale: Specs Compared

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Lucid Gravity burns about $700 of fuel annually against $950 for the Maserati Grecale. That $250 yearly gap compounds to roughly $1,250 over five years and $2,000 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City and highway economy: the Lucid Gravity leads in both cycles — 115 mpg city and 106 mpg highway against 83 and 78 mpg — so its fuel-efficiency advantage holds whether you commute in traffic or cover long highway miles.

Powertrain choice: the Lucid Gravity is recorded with no distinct engine configurations, the Maserati Grecale with 2 (SIDI & PFI, SIDI; Mild Hybrid). Across 23 recorded Lucid Gravity configurations and 16 for the Maserati Grecale, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.

Drivetrain and class: the Lucid Gravity is offered with All-Wheel Drive, the Maserati Grecale with All-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.