BMW i4 vs Mercedes-Benz EQS: Specs Compared

Also searched as Mercedes-Benz EQS vs BMW i4 specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.

The BMW i4 is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 120 mpg combined versus 103 mpg for the Mercedes-Benz EQS, a 17 mpg advantage and costs about $50 less per year to fuel.

Across 4 measured categories, the BMW i4 leads in 4. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.

2022–2026

BMW i4

Subcompact Cars · 33 configurations

120mpg combined (best)
All BMW i4 specs

2022–2027

Mercedes-Benz EQS

Large Cars · 32 configurations

103mpg combined (best)
All Mercedes-Benz EQS specs

Head-to-head specifications

MetricBMW i4Mercedes-Benz EQS
Best combined MPG120 mpg ✓103 mpg
Best city MPG122 mpg ✓101 mpg
Best highway MPG119 mpg ✓105 mpg
Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year$650 ✓$700
Lowest CO2 outputNot availableNot available
Engines offeredNot availableNot available
TransmissionsAutomatic (A1)Automatic (A1)
DrivetrainsAll-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel DriveAll-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Fuel typesElectricityElectricity
EPA classSubcompact CarsLarge Cars
Years covered2022–20262022–2027
Configurations on record3332

Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.

BMW i4 vs Mercedes-Benz EQS: what the numbers mean

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the BMW i4 burns about $650 of fuel annually against $700 for the Mercedes-Benz EQS. That $50 yearly gap compounds to roughly $250 over five years and $400 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City and highway economy: the BMW i4 leads in both cycles — 122 mpg city and 119 mpg highway against 101 and 105 mpg — so its fuel-efficiency advantage holds whether you commute in traffic or cover long highway miles.

Drivetrain and class: the BMW i4 is offered with All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive, the Mercedes-Benz EQS with All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Subcompact Cars and Large Cars respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

i4 vs EQS: common questions

Which is better on gas, the BMW i4 or the Mercedes-Benz EQS?

The BMW i4 is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 120 mpg combined versus 103 mpg for the Mercedes-Benz EQS, a 17 mpg advantage and costs about $50 less per year to fuel.

Which costs less to run per year?

By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the BMW i4 runs about $650 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $700 for the Mercedes-Benz EQS — a difference of roughly $50 per year.

What engines do the i4 and EQS offer?

BMW i4: no engine data on record. Mercedes-Benz EQS: no engine data on record.

Are they in the same vehicle class?

The EPA classifies the BMW i4 as Subcompact Cars and the Mercedes-Benz EQS as Large Cars, so they aren't a like-for-like match on size.

More i4 comparisons

More EQS comparisons

Comparison id: bmw-i4-vs-mercedes-benz-eqs