Polestar 3 vs Subaru Solterra: Specs Compared

Also searched as Subaru Solterra vs Polestar 3 specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.

The Subaru Solterra is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 120 mpg combined versus 97 mpg for the Polestar 3, a 23 mpg advantage and costs about $150 less per year to fuel.

Across 4 measured categories, the Subaru Solterra leads in 4. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.

2025–2026

Polestar 3

Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 12 configurations

97mpg combined (best)
All Polestar 3 specs

2023–2027

Subaru Solterra

Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 10 configurations

120mpg combined (best)
All Subaru Solterra specs

Head-to-head specifications

MetricPolestar 3Subaru Solterra
Best combined MPG97 mpg120 mpg ✓
Best city MPG105 mpg131 mpg ✓
Best highway MPG89 mpg109 mpg ✓
Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year$800$650 ✓
Lowest CO2 outputNot availableNot available
Engines offeredNot availableNot available
TransmissionsAutomatic (A1)Automatic (A1)
DrivetrainsRear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel DriveAll-Wheel Drive
Fuel typesElectricityElectricity
EPA classStandard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WDSmall Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
Years covered2025–20262023–2027
Configurations on record1210

Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.

Polestar 3 vs Subaru Solterra: what the numbers mean

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Subaru Solterra burns about $650 of fuel annually against $800 for the Polestar 3. That $150 yearly gap compounds to roughly $750 over five years and $1,200 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City and highway economy: the Subaru Solterra leads in both cycles — 131 mpg city and 109 mpg highway against 105 and 89 mpg — so its fuel-efficiency advantage holds whether you commute in traffic or cover long highway miles.

Drivetrain and class: the Polestar 3 is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, the Subaru Solterra with All-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

3 vs Solterra: common questions

Which is better on gas, the Polestar 3 or the Subaru Solterra?

The Subaru Solterra is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 120 mpg combined versus 97 mpg for the Polestar 3, a 23 mpg advantage and costs about $150 less per year to fuel.

Which costs less to run per year?

By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Subaru Solterra runs about $650 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $800 for the Polestar 3 — a difference of roughly $150 per year.

What engines do the 3 and Solterra offer?

Polestar 3: no engine data on record. Subaru Solterra: no engine data on record.

Are they in the same vehicle class?

The EPA classifies the Polestar 3 as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and the Subaru Solterra as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they aren't a like-for-like match on size.

More 3 comparisons

More Solterra comparisons

Comparison id: polestar-3-vs-subaru-solterra