Polestar 3 vs Porsche Macan: Specs Compared
Also searched as Porsche Macan vs Polestar 3 specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.
The Porsche Macan is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 105 mpg combined versus 97 mpg for the Polestar 3, a 8 mpg advantage and costs about $100 less per year to fuel.
Across 4 measured categories, the Porsche Macan leads in 4. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2025–2026
Polestar 3
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 12 configurations
2015–2026
Porsche Macan
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 56 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Polestar 3 | Porsche Macan |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 97 mpg | 105 mpg ✓ |
| Best city MPG | 105 mpg | 114 mpg ✓ |
| Best highway MPG | 89 mpg | 96 mpg ✓ |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $800 | $700 ✓ |
| Lowest CO2 output | Not available | 399 g/mi |
| Engines offered | Not available | SIDI |
| Transmissions | Automatic (A1) | Automatic (A1), Automatic (AM-S7) |
| Drivetrains | Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Electricity | Electricity, Premium |
| EPA class | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Years covered | 2025–2026 | 2015–2026 |
| Configurations on record | 12 | 56 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Polestar 3 vs Porsche Macan: what the numbers mean
Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Porsche Macan burns about $700 of fuel annually against $800 for the Polestar 3. That $100 yearly gap compounds to roughly $500 over five years and $800 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.
City and highway economy: the Porsche Macan leads in both cycles — 114 mpg city and 96 mpg highway against 105 and 89 mpg — so its fuel-efficiency advantage holds whether you commute in traffic or cover long highway miles.
Powertrain choice: the Polestar 3 is recorded with no distinct engine configurations, the Porsche Macan with 1 (SIDI). Across 12 recorded Polestar 3 configurations and 56 for the Porsche Macan, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.
Drivetrain and class: the Polestar 3 is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, the Porsche Macan with All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.
3 vs Macan: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Polestar 3 or the Porsche Macan?
The Porsche Macan is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 105 mpg combined versus 97 mpg for the Polestar 3, a 8 mpg advantage and costs about $100 less per year to fuel.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Porsche Macan runs about $700 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $800 for the Polestar 3 — a difference of roughly $100 per year.
What engines do the 3 and Macan offer?
Polestar 3: no engine data on record. Porsche Macan: SIDI.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
The EPA classifies the Polestar 3 as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and the Porsche Macan as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they aren't a like-for-like match on size.
More 3 comparisons
More Macan comparisons
Comparison id: polestar-3-vs-porsche-macan