Maserati Grancabrio vs MINI Countryman: Specs Compared

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the MINI Countryman burns about $800 of fuel annually against $900 for the Maserati Grancabrio. That $100 yearly gap compounds to roughly $500 over five years and $800 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City and highway economy: the MINI Countryman leads in both cycles — 101 mpg city and 94 mpg highway against 84 and 82 mpg — so its fuel-efficiency advantage holds whether you commute in traffic or cover long highway miles.

Powertrain choice: the Maserati Grancabrio is recorded with 1 distinct engine configuration (SIDI & PFI), the MINI Countryman with 4 (SIDI & PFI, SIDI, SIDI; PHEV). Across 9 recorded Maserati Grancabrio configurations and 75 for the MINI Countryman, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.

Drivetrain and class: the Maserati Grancabrio is offered with All-Wheel Drive, the MINI Countryman with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Subcompact Cars and Midsize Cars respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the MINI Countryman emits 175 g/mile of CO2 versus 430 g/mile for the Maserati Grancabrio. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.