Lincoln Nautilus vs Volvo XC60: Specs Compared

Also searched as Volvo XC60 vs Lincoln Nautilus specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.

The Lincoln Nautilus is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 30 mpg combined versus 28 mpg for the Volvo XC60, a 2 mpg advantage and costs about $250 less per year to fuel.

Across 4 measured categories, the Lincoln Nautilus leads in 3. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.

2019–2026

Lincoln Nautilus

Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 28 configurations

30mpg combined (best)
All Lincoln Nautilus specs

2015–2027

Volvo XC60

Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 44 configurations

28mpg combined (best)
All Volvo XC60 specs

Head-to-head specifications

MetricLincoln NautilusVolvo XC60
Best combined MPG30 mpg ✓28 mpg
Best city MPG30 mpg ✓28 mpg
Best highway MPG31 mpg31 mpg
Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year$2,050 ✓$2,300
Lowest CO2 output290 g/mi122 g/mi ✓
Engines offeredSIDI & PFI; Hybrid, SIDI & PFI, SIDISIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI; PHEV, 2.0, SIDI
TransmissionsAutomatic (variable gear ratios), Automatic 8-spd, Automatic (S8)Automatic (S8), Automatic (S6)
DrivetrainsPart-time 4-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel DriveAll-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Fuel typesRegularPremium, Premium and Electricity, Regular
EPA classSmall Sport Utility Vehicle 4WDSmall Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
Years covered2019–20262015–2027
Configurations on record2844

Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.

Lincoln Nautilus vs Volvo XC60 dimensions and size

The Lincoln Nautilus is 8.3 inches longer than the Volvo XC60 on a wheelbase 1.2 inches longer, and 229.3 lbs heavier. Both clear the roughly 200 inches of usable length in a standard single garage bay.

Lincoln Nautilus versus Volvo XC60 exterior dimensions
DimensionLincoln Nautilus (2026)Volvo XC60 (2026)Difference
Length193.3 in185 in8.3 in
Width (excl. mirrors)79.9 in74.8 in5.1 in
Height68.1 in65.4 in2.8 in
Wheelbase114.2 in113 in1.2 in
Curb weight4,350 lbs4,120 lbs229 lbs

Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.

Lincoln Nautilus vs Volvo XC60: what the numbers mean

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Lincoln Nautilus burns about $2,050 of fuel annually against $2,300 for the Volvo XC60. That $250 yearly gap compounds to roughly $1,250 over five years and $2,000 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City versus highway split: the Lincoln Nautilus is the stronger commuter at 30 mpg city, while the Volvo XC60 pulls ahead on the interstate at 31 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.

Powertrain choice: the Lincoln Nautilus is recorded with 3 distinct engine configurations (SIDI & PFI; Hybrid, SIDI & PFI, SIDI), the Volvo XC60 with 4 (SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI; PHEV, 2.0). Across 28 recorded Lincoln Nautilus configurations and 44 for the Volvo XC60, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.

Drivetrain and class: the Lincoln Nautilus is offered with Part-time 4-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, the Volvo XC60 with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Volvo XC60 emits 122 g/mile of CO2 versus 290 g/mile for the Lincoln Nautilus. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.

Nautilus vs XC60: common questions

Which is better on gas, the Lincoln Nautilus or the Volvo XC60?

The Lincoln Nautilus is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 30 mpg combined versus 28 mpg for the Volvo XC60, a 2 mpg advantage and costs about $250 less per year to fuel.

Which costs less to run per year?

By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Lincoln Nautilus runs about $2,050 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,300 for the Volvo XC60 — a difference of roughly $250 per year.

What engines do the Nautilus and XC60 offer?

Lincoln Nautilus: SIDI & PFI; Hybrid, SIDI & PFI, SIDI. Volvo XC60: SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI; PHEV, 2.0, SIDI.

Are they in the same vehicle class?

Yes — the EPA classifies both the Lincoln Nautilus and the Volvo XC60 as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they compete directly.

More Nautilus comparisons

More XC60 comparisons

Comparison id: lincoln-nautilus-vs-volvo-xc60