Infiniti QX50 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross: Specs Compared
Also searched as Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Infiniti QX50 specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.
The Infiniti QX50 and Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross are evenly matched on fuel economy — both peak at 27 mpg combined — so the decision comes down to engine choice, drivetrain, and class.
Across 4 measured categories, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross leads in 3. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2015–2025
Infiniti QX50
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD · 20 configurations
2018–2026
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 28 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Infiniti QX50 | Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 27 mpg | 27 mpg |
| Best city MPG | 24 mpg | 26 mpg ✓ |
| Best highway MPG | 31 mpg ✓ | 29 mpg |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $2,800 | $2,300 ✓ |
| Lowest CO2 output | 336 g/mi | 327 g/mi ✓ |
| Engines offered | SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; VCR, 3.7 | SIDI |
| Transmissions | Automatic (AV-S8), Automatic (S7) | Automatic (AV-S8) |
| Drivetrains | Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive | 4-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Premium | Regular |
| EPA class | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Years covered | 2015–2025 | 2018–2026 |
| Configurations on record | 20 | 28 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Infiniti QX50 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross dimensions and size
The Infiniti QX50 is 5.9 inches longer than the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross on a wheelbase 5.1 inches longer, and 701.1 lbs heavier. Both clear the roughly 200 inches of usable length in a standard single garage bay.
| Dimension | Infiniti QX50 (2026) | Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross (2026) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 185 in | 179.1 in | 5.9 in |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 75.2 in | 71.3 in | 3.9 in |
| Height | 66.1 in | 66.1 in | identical |
| Wheelbase | 110.2 in | 105.1 in | 5.1 in |
| Curb weight | 4,173 lbs | 3,472 lbs | 701 lbs |
Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.
Infiniti QX50 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross: what the numbers mean
Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross burns about $2,300 of fuel annually against $2,800 for the Infiniti QX50. That $500 yearly gap compounds to roughly $2,500 over five years and $4,000 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.
City versus highway split: the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is the stronger commuter at 26 mpg city, while the Infiniti QX50 pulls ahead on the interstate at 31 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.
Powertrain choice: the Infiniti QX50 is recorded with 3 distinct engine configurations (SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; VCR, 3.7), the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross with 1 (SIDI). Across 20 recorded Infiniti QX50 configurations and 28 for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.
Drivetrain and class: the Infiniti QX50 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross with 4-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.
Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross emits 327 g/mile of CO2 versus 336 g/mile for the Infiniti QX50. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.
QX50 vs Eclipse Cross: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Infiniti QX50 or the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross?
The Infiniti QX50 and Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross are evenly matched on fuel economy — both peak at 27 mpg combined — so the decision comes down to engine choice, drivetrain, and class.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross runs about $2,300 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,800 for the Infiniti QX50 — a difference of roughly $500 per year.
What engines do the QX50 and Eclipse Cross offer?
Infiniti QX50: SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; VCR, 3.7. Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross: SIDI.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
The EPA classifies the Infiniti QX50 as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD and the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they aren't a like-for-like match on size.
More QX50 comparisons
More Eclipse Cross comparisons
Comparison id: infiniti-qx50-vs-mitsubishi-eclipse-cross