GMC Terrain vs Kia Sportage: Specs Compared

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Kia Sportage burns about $1,450 of fuel annually against $2,200 for the GMC Terrain. That $750 yearly gap compounds to roughly $3,750 over five years and $6,000 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City and highway economy: the Kia Sportage leads in both cycles — 42 mpg city and 44 mpg highway against 28 and 39 mpg — so its fuel-efficiency advantage holds whether you commute in traffic or cover long highway miles.

Powertrain choice: the GMC Terrain is recorded with 3 distinct engine configurations (SIDI, 1.6, SIDI; FFV), the Kia Sportage with 4 (SIDI; PHEV, SIDI & PFI, SIDI; Hybrid). Across 47 recorded GMC Terrain configurations and 69 for the Kia Sportage, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.

Drivetrain and class: the GMC Terrain is offered with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, the Kia Sportage with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Kia Sportage emits 55 g/mile of CO2 versus 316 g/mile for the GMC Terrain. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.