Ford Edge vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross: Specs Compared
Also searched as Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Ford Edge specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.
The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 27 mpg combined versus 25 mpg for the Ford Edge, a 2 mpg advantage and costs about $150 less per year to fuel.
Across 5 measured categories, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross leads in 4. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2015–2024
Ford Edge
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 45 configurations
2018–2026
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 28 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Ford Edge | Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 25 mpg | 27 mpg ✓ |
| Best city MPG | 22 mpg | 26 mpg ✓ |
| Best highway MPG | 30 mpg ✓ | 29 mpg |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $2,450 | $2,300 ✓ |
| Lowest CO2 output | 360 g/mi | 327 g/mi ✓ |
| Engines offered | SIDI, SIDI; with Semi-Auto Trans, 3.5, SIDI; Stop-Start | SIDI |
| Transmissions | Automatic (S8), Automatic 8-spd, Automatic (S6) | Automatic (AV-S8) |
| Drivetrains | All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive | 4-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Regular | Regular |
| EPA class | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Years covered | 2015–2024 | 2018–2026 |
| Configurations on record | 45 | 28 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Ford Edge vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross dimensions and size
The Ford Edge is 9.8 inches longer than the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross on a wheelbase 7.1 inches longer, and 661.4 lbs heavier. Both clear the roughly 200 inches of usable length in a standard single garage bay.
| Dimension | Ford Edge (2025) | Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross (2026) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 189 in | 179.1 in | 9.8 in |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 76 in | 71.3 in | 4.7 in |
| Height | 68.5 in | 66.1 in | 2.4 in |
| Wheelbase | 112.2 in | 105.1 in | 7.1 in |
| Curb weight | 4,134 lbs | 3,472 lbs | 661 lbs |
Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.
Ford Edge vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross: what the numbers mean
Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross burns about $2,300 of fuel annually against $2,450 for the Ford Edge. That $150 yearly gap compounds to roughly $750 over five years and $1,200 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.
City versus highway split: the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is the stronger commuter at 26 mpg city, while the Ford Edge pulls ahead on the interstate at 30 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.
Powertrain choice: the Ford Edge is recorded with 4 distinct engine configurations (SIDI, SIDI; with Semi-Auto Trans, 3.5), the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross with 1 (SIDI). Across 45 recorded Ford Edge configurations and 28 for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.
Drivetrain and class: the Ford Edge is offered with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross with 4-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.
Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross emits 327 g/mile of CO2 versus 360 g/mile for the Ford Edge. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.
Edge vs Eclipse Cross: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Ford Edge or the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross?
The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 27 mpg combined versus 25 mpg for the Ford Edge, a 2 mpg advantage and costs about $150 less per year to fuel.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross runs about $2,300 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,450 for the Ford Edge — a difference of roughly $150 per year.
What engines do the Edge and Eclipse Cross offer?
Ford Edge: SIDI, SIDI; with Semi-Auto Trans, 3.5, SIDI; Stop-Start. Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross: SIDI.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
Yes — the EPA classifies both the Ford Edge and the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they compete directly.
More Edge comparisons
More Eclipse Cross comparisons
Comparison id: ford-edge-vs-mitsubishi-eclipse-cross