Ford Edge vs Toyota Sequoia: Specs Compared
Also searched as Toyota Sequoia vs Ford Edge specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.
The Ford Edge is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 25 mpg combined versus 22 mpg for the Toyota Sequoia, a 3 mpg advantage and costs about $350 less per year to fuel.
Across 5 measured categories, the Ford Edge leads in 5. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2015–2024
Ford Edge
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 45 configurations
2015–2026
Toyota Sequoia
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 30 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Ford Edge | Toyota Sequoia |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 25 mpg ✓ | 22 mpg |
| Best city MPG | 22 mpg ✓ | 21 mpg |
| Best highway MPG | 30 mpg ✓ | 24 mpg |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $2,450 ✓ | $2,800 |
| Lowest CO2 output | 360 g/mi ✓ | 395 g/mi |
| Engines offered | SIDI, SIDI; with Semi-Auto Trans, 3.5, SIDI; Stop-Start | SIDI & PFI; Hybrid, 5.7, FFV |
| Transmissions | Automatic (S8), Automatic 8-spd, Automatic (S6) | Automatic (S10), Automatic (S6) |
| Drivetrains | All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive, Part-time 4-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Regular | Regular, Premium, Gasoline or E85 |
| EPA class | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Years covered | 2015–2024 | 2015–2026 |
| Configurations on record | 45 | 30 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Ford Edge vs Toyota Sequoia dimensions and size
The Toyota Sequoia is 19.3 inches longer than the Ford Edge on a wheelbase 9.8 inches longer, and 2,017.2 lbs heavier. At over 200 inches, the larger of the two is past the comfortable limit of a standard 192-inch single garage bay once you allow walking room.
| Dimension | Ford Edge (2025) | Toyota Sequoia (2026) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 189 in | 208.3 in | 19.3 in |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 76 in | 79.5 in | 3.5 in |
| Height | 68.5 in | 74.4 in | 5.9 in |
| Wheelbase | 112.2 in | 122 in | 9.8 in |
| Curb weight | 4,134 lbs | 6,151 lbs | 2,017 lbs |
Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.
Ford Edge vs Toyota Sequoia: what the numbers mean
Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Ford Edge burns about $2,450 of fuel annually against $2,800 for the Toyota Sequoia. That $350 yearly gap compounds to roughly $1,750 over five years and $2,800 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.
City and highway economy: the Ford Edge leads in both cycles — 22 mpg city and 30 mpg highway against 21 and 24 mpg — so its fuel-efficiency advantage holds whether you commute in traffic or cover long highway miles.
Powertrain choice: the Ford Edge is recorded with 4 distinct engine configurations (SIDI, SIDI; with Semi-Auto Trans, 3.5), the Toyota Sequoia with 3 (SIDI & PFI; Hybrid, 5.7, FFV). Across 45 recorded Ford Edge configurations and 30 for the Toyota Sequoia, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.
Drivetrain and class: the Ford Edge is offered with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, the Toyota Sequoia with Rear-Wheel Drive, Part-time 4-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.
Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Ford Edge emits 360 g/mile of CO2 versus 395 g/mile for the Toyota Sequoia. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.
Edge vs Sequoia: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Ford Edge or the Toyota Sequoia?
The Ford Edge is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 25 mpg combined versus 22 mpg for the Toyota Sequoia, a 3 mpg advantage and costs about $350 less per year to fuel.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Ford Edge runs about $2,450 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,800 for the Toyota Sequoia — a difference of roughly $350 per year.
What engines do the Edge and Sequoia offer?
Ford Edge: SIDI, SIDI; with Semi-Auto Trans, 3.5, SIDI; Stop-Start. Toyota Sequoia: SIDI & PFI; Hybrid, 5.7, FFV.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
The EPA classifies the Ford Edge as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and the Toyota Sequoia as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they aren't a like-for-like match on size.
More Edge comparisons
More Sequoia comparisons
Comparison id: ford-edge-vs-toyota-sequoia