Audi SQ8 e-tron vs Jeep Wagoneer: Specs Compared

Also searched as Jeep Wagoneer vs Audi SQ8 e-tron specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.

The Jeep Wagoneer is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 97 mpg combined versus 73 mpg for the Audi SQ8 e-tron, a 24 mpg advantage and costs about $250 less per year to fuel.

Across 4 measured categories, the Jeep Wagoneer leads in 4. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.

2024–2025

Audi SQ8 e-tron

Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 8 configurations

73mpg combined (best)
All Audi SQ8 e-tron specs

2022–2026

Jeep Wagoneer

Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 22 configurations

97mpg combined (best)
All Jeep Wagoneer specs

Head-to-head specifications

MetricAudi SQ8 e-tronJeep Wagoneer
Best combined MPG73 mpg97 mpg ✓
Best city MPG72 mpg104 mpg ✓
Best highway MPG75 mpg90 mpg ✓
Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year$1,050$800 ✓
Lowest CO2 outputNot available453 g/mi
Engines offeredNot availableSIDI, Mild Hybrid
TransmissionsAutomatic (A1), Automatic (A2)Automatic (A1), Automatic 8-spd
DrivetrainsAll-Wheel DriveAll-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Fuel typesElectricityElectricity, Regular, Midgrade
EPA classStandard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WDStandard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
Years covered2024–20252022–2026
Configurations on record822

Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.

Audi SQ8 e-tron vs Jeep Wagoneer dimensions and size

The Jeep Wagoneer is 20.9 inches longer than the Audi SQ8 e-tron on a wheelbase 7.5 inches longer, and 116.9 lbs heavier. At over 200 inches, the larger of the two is past the comfortable limit of a standard 192-inch single garage bay once you allow walking room.

Audi SQ8 e-tron versus Jeep Wagoneer exterior dimensions
DimensionAudi SQ8 e-tron (2025)Jeep Wagoneer (2026)Difference
Length193.7 in214.6 in20.9 in
Width (excl. mirrors)76.4 in83.5 in7.1 in
Height64.2 in75.6 in11.4 in
Wheelbase115.4 in122.8 in7.5 in
Curb weight5,842 lbs5,959 lbs117 lbs

Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.

Audi SQ8 e-tron vs Jeep Wagoneer: what the numbers mean

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Jeep Wagoneer burns about $800 of fuel annually against $1,050 for the Audi SQ8 e-tron. That $250 yearly gap compounds to roughly $1,250 over five years and $2,000 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City and highway economy: the Jeep Wagoneer leads in both cycles — 104 mpg city and 90 mpg highway against 72 and 75 mpg — so its fuel-efficiency advantage holds whether you commute in traffic or cover long highway miles.

Powertrain choice: the Audi SQ8 e-tron is recorded with no distinct engine configurations, the Jeep Wagoneer with 2 (SIDI, Mild Hybrid). Across 8 recorded Audi SQ8 e-tron configurations and 22 for the Jeep Wagoneer, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.

Drivetrain and class: the Audi SQ8 e-tron is offered with All-Wheel Drive, the Jeep Wagoneer with All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

SQ8 e-tron vs Wagoneer: common questions

Which is better on gas, the Audi SQ8 e-tron or the Jeep Wagoneer?

The Jeep Wagoneer is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 97 mpg combined versus 73 mpg for the Audi SQ8 e-tron, a 24 mpg advantage and costs about $250 less per year to fuel.

Which costs less to run per year?

By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Jeep Wagoneer runs about $800 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $1,050 for the Audi SQ8 e-tron — a difference of roughly $250 per year.

What engines do the SQ8 e-tron and Wagoneer offer?

Audi SQ8 e-tron: no engine data on record. Jeep Wagoneer: SIDI, Mild Hybrid.

Are they in the same vehicle class?

Yes — the EPA classifies both the Audi SQ8 e-tron and the Jeep Wagoneer as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they compete directly.

More SQ8 e-tron comparisons

More Wagoneer comparisons

Comparison id: audi-sq8-e-tron-vs-jeep-wagoneer