Alfa Romeo Giulia vs MINI Clubman: Specs Compared

Also searched as MINI Clubman vs Alfa Romeo Giulia specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.

The MINI Clubman is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 29 mpg combined versus 27 mpg for the Alfa Romeo Giulia, a 2 mpg advantage and costs about $200 less per year to fuel.

Across 5 measured categories, the MINI Clubman leads in 5. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.

2017–2026

Alfa Romeo Giulia

Midsize Cars · 28 configurations

27mpg combined (best)
All Alfa Romeo Giulia specs

2016–2024

MINI Clubman

Midsize Cars · 44 configurations

29mpg combined (best)
All MINI Clubman specs

Head-to-head specifications

MetricAlfa Romeo GiuliaMINI Clubman
Best combined MPG27 mpg29 mpg ✓
Best city MPG24 mpg26 mpg ✓
Best highway MPG33 mpg35 mpg ✓
Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year$2,800$2,600 ✓
Lowest CO2 output330 g/mi304 g/mi ✓
Engines offeredSIDISIDI
TransmissionsAutomatic 8-spdAutomatic (AM-S7), Manual 6-spd, Automatic (S8)
DrivetrainsAll-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel DriveFront-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Fuel typesPremiumPremium
EPA classMidsize CarsMidsize Cars
Years covered2017–20262016–2024
Configurations on record2844

Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.

Alfa Romeo Giulia vs MINI Clubman: what the numbers mean

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the MINI Clubman burns about $2,600 of fuel annually against $2,800 for the Alfa Romeo Giulia. That $200 yearly gap compounds to roughly $1,000 over five years and $1,600 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City and highway economy: the MINI Clubman leads in both cycles — 26 mpg city and 35 mpg highway against 24 and 33 mpg — so its fuel-efficiency advantage holds whether you commute in traffic or cover long highway miles.

Powertrain choice: the Alfa Romeo Giulia is recorded with 1 distinct engine configuration (SIDI), the MINI Clubman with 1 (SIDI). Across 28 recorded Alfa Romeo Giulia configurations and 44 for the MINI Clubman, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.

Drivetrain and class: the Alfa Romeo Giulia is offered with All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, the MINI Clubman with Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Midsize Cars and Midsize Cars respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the MINI Clubman emits 304 g/mile of CO2 versus 330 g/mile for the Alfa Romeo Giulia. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.

Giulia vs Clubman: common questions

Which is better on gas, the Alfa Romeo Giulia or the MINI Clubman?

The MINI Clubman is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 29 mpg combined versus 27 mpg for the Alfa Romeo Giulia, a 2 mpg advantage and costs about $200 less per year to fuel.

Which costs less to run per year?

By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the MINI Clubman runs about $2,600 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,800 for the Alfa Romeo Giulia — a difference of roughly $200 per year.

What engines do the Giulia and Clubman offer?

Alfa Romeo Giulia: SIDI. MINI Clubman: SIDI.

Are they in the same vehicle class?

Yes — the EPA classifies both the Alfa Romeo Giulia and the MINI Clubman as Midsize Cars, so they compete directly.

More Giulia comparisons

More Clubman comparisons

Comparison id: alfa-romeo-giulia-vs-mini-clubman