Toyota bZ vs Volvo EX30: Specs Compared

Also searched as Volvo EX30 vs Toyota bZ specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.

The Toyota bZ is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 131 mpg combined versus 116 mpg for the Volvo EX30, a 15 mpg advantage and costs about $100 less per year to fuel.

Across 4 measured categories, the Toyota bZ leads in 4. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.

2026–2026

Toyota bZ

Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 8 configurations

131mpg combined (best)
All Toyota bZ specs

2025–2026

Volvo EX30

Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 8 configurations

116mpg combined (best)
All Volvo EX30 specs

Head-to-head specifications

MetricToyota bZVolvo EX30
Best combined MPG131 mpg ✓116 mpg
Best city MPG144 mpg ✓127 mpg
Best highway MPG119 mpg ✓104 mpg
Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year$550 ✓$650
Lowest CO2 outputNot availableNot available
Engines offeredNot availableNot available
TransmissionsAutomatic (A1)Automatic (A1)
DrivetrainsAll-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel DriveAll-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Fuel typesElectricityElectricity
EPA classSmall Sport Utility Vehicle 4WDSmall Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
Years covered2026–20262025–2026
Configurations on record88

Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.

Toyota bZ vs Volvo EX30 dimensions and size

The Toyota bZ is 18.1 inches longer than the Volvo EX30 on a wheelbase 7.9 inches longer, and 429.9 lbs heavier. Both clear the roughly 200 inches of usable length in a standard single garage bay.

Toyota bZ versus Volvo EX30 exterior dimensions
DimensionToyota bZ (2026)Volvo EX30 (2026)Difference
Length184.6 in166.5 in18.1 in
Width (excl. mirrors)73.2 in72.4 in0.8 in
Height65 in61 in3.9 in
Wheelbase112.2 in104.3 in7.9 in
Curb weight4,464 lbs4,034 lbs430 lbs

Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.

Toyota bZ vs Volvo EX30: what the numbers mean

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Toyota bZ burns about $550 of fuel annually against $650 for the Volvo EX30. That $100 yearly gap compounds to roughly $500 over five years and $800 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City and highway economy: the Toyota bZ leads in both cycles — 144 mpg city and 119 mpg highway against 127 and 104 mpg — so its fuel-efficiency advantage holds whether you commute in traffic or cover long highway miles.

Drivetrain and class: the Toyota bZ is offered with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, the Volvo EX30 with All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

bZ vs EX30: common questions

Which is better on gas, the Toyota bZ or the Volvo EX30?

The Toyota bZ is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 131 mpg combined versus 116 mpg for the Volvo EX30, a 15 mpg advantage and costs about $100 less per year to fuel.

Which costs less to run per year?

By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Toyota bZ runs about $550 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $650 for the Volvo EX30 — a difference of roughly $100 per year.

What engines do the bZ and EX30 offer?

Toyota bZ: no engine data on record. Volvo EX30: no engine data on record.

Are they in the same vehicle class?

Yes — the EPA classifies both the Toyota bZ and the Volvo EX30 as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they compete directly.

More bZ comparisons

More EX30 comparisons

Comparison id: toyota-bz-vs-volvo-ex30