Mercedes-Benz AMG GT vs Nissan Z: Specs Compared

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Mercedes-Benz AMG GT burns about $3,450 of fuel annually against $3,450 for the Nissan Z. That $0 yearly gap compounds to roughly $0 over five years and $0 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City versus highway split: the Mercedes-Benz AMG GT is the stronger commuter at 20 mpg city, while the Nissan Z pulls ahead on the interstate at 28 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.

Powertrain choice: the Mercedes-Benz AMG GT is recorded with 3 distinct engine configurations (SIDI, SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI; PHEV), the Nissan Z with 1 (SIDI). Across 67 recorded Mercedes-Benz AMG GT configurations and 15 for the Nissan Z, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.

Drivetrain and class: the Mercedes-Benz AMG GT is offered with All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive, the Nissan Z with Rear-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Two Seaters and Two Seaters respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Mercedes-Benz AMG GT emits 397 g/mile of CO2 versus 405 g/mile for the Nissan Z. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.