Lamborghini Urus vs Maserati Levante: Specs Compared

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Lamborghini Urus burns about $3,800 of fuel annually against $4,200 for the Maserati Levante. That $400 yearly gap compounds to roughly $2,000 over five years and $3,200 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City versus highway split: the Lamborghini Urus is the stronger commuter at 19 mpg city, while the Maserati Levante pulls ahead on the interstate at 22 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.

Powertrain choice: the Lamborghini Urus is recorded with 4 distinct engine configurations (SIDI; PHEV, SIDI, 4.0), the Maserati Levante with 1 (SIDI). Across 10 recorded Lamborghini Urus configurations and 28 for the Maserati Levante, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.

Drivetrain and class: the Lamborghini Urus is offered with 4-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, the Maserati Levante with All-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Lamborghini Urus emits 166 g/mile of CO2 versus 495 g/mile for the Maserati Levante. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.