Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs Land Rover Defender: Specs Compared
Also searched as Land Rover Defender vs Jeep Grand Wagoneer specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.
The Land Rover Defender is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 20 mpg combined versus 19 mpg for the Jeep Grand Wagoneer, a 1 mpg advantage and costs about $550 less per year to fuel.
Across 5 measured categories, the Land Rover Defender leads in 3. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2022–2026
Jeep Grand Wagoneer
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 16 configurations
2020–2026
Land Rover Defender
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 54 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Jeep Grand Wagoneer | Land Rover Defender |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 19 mpg | 20 mpg ✓ |
| Best city MPG | 17 mpg | 18 mpg ✓ |
| Best highway MPG | 24 mpg ✓ | 23 mpg |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $3,250 ✓ | $3,800 |
| Lowest CO2 output | 456 g/mi | 444 g/mi ✓ |
| Engines offered | SIDI, 6.4 | SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI |
| Transmissions | Automatic 8-spd | Automatic (S8) |
| Drivetrains | Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | 4-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Regular, Premium | Premium |
| EPA class | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Years covered | 2022–2026 | 2020–2026 |
| Configurations on record | 16 | 54 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs Land Rover Defender dimensions and size
The Jeep Grand Wagoneer is 27.2 inches longer than the Land Rover Defender on a wheelbase 3.9 inches longer, and 1,521.2 lbs heavier. At over 200 inches, the larger of the two is past the comfortable limit of a standard 192-inch single garage bay once you allow walking room.
| Dimension | Jeep Grand Wagoneer (2026) | Land Rover Defender (2026) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 214.6 in | 187.4 in | 27.2 in |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 83.5 in | 79.1 in | 4.3 in |
| Height | 75.6 in | 77.6 in | 2 in |
| Wheelbase | 122.8 in | 118.9 in | 3.9 in |
| Curb weight | 6,340 lbs | 4,819 lbs | 1,521 lbs |
Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.
Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs Land Rover Defender: what the numbers mean
Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Jeep Grand Wagoneer burns about $3,250 of fuel annually against $3,800 for the Land Rover Defender. That $550 yearly gap compounds to roughly $2,750 over five years and $4,400 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.
City versus highway split: the Land Rover Defender is the stronger commuter at 18 mpg city, while the Jeep Grand Wagoneer pulls ahead on the interstate at 24 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.
Powertrain choice: the Jeep Grand Wagoneer is recorded with 2 distinct engine configurations (SIDI, 6.4), the Land Rover Defender with 2 (SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI). Across 16 recorded Jeep Grand Wagoneer configurations and 54 for the Land Rover Defender, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.
Drivetrain and class: the Jeep Grand Wagoneer is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, the Land Rover Defender with 4-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.
Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Land Rover Defender emits 444 g/mile of CO2 versus 456 g/mile for the Jeep Grand Wagoneer. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.
Grand Wagoneer vs Defender: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Jeep Grand Wagoneer or the Land Rover Defender?
The Land Rover Defender is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 20 mpg combined versus 19 mpg for the Jeep Grand Wagoneer, a 1 mpg advantage and costs about $550 less per year to fuel.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Jeep Grand Wagoneer runs about $3,250 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $3,800 for the Land Rover Defender — a difference of roughly $550 per year.
What engines do the Grand Wagoneer and Defender offer?
Jeep Grand Wagoneer: SIDI, 6.4. Land Rover Defender: SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
Yes — the EPA classifies both the Jeep Grand Wagoneer and the Land Rover Defender as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they compete directly.
More Grand Wagoneer comparisons
More Defender comparisons
Comparison id: jeep-grand-wagoneer-vs-land-rover-defender