Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs Land Rover Defender: Specs Compared

Also searched as Land Rover Defender vs Jeep Grand Wagoneer specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.

The Land Rover Defender is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 20 mpg combined versus 19 mpg for the Jeep Grand Wagoneer, a 1 mpg advantage and costs about $550 less per year to fuel.

Across 5 measured categories, the Land Rover Defender leads in 3. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.

2022–2026

Jeep Grand Wagoneer

Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 16 configurations

19mpg combined (best)
All Jeep Grand Wagoneer specs

2020–2026

Land Rover Defender

Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 54 configurations

20mpg combined (best)
All Land Rover Defender specs

Head-to-head specifications

MetricJeep Grand WagoneerLand Rover Defender
Best combined MPG19 mpg20 mpg ✓
Best city MPG17 mpg18 mpg ✓
Best highway MPG24 mpg ✓23 mpg
Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year$3,250 ✓$3,800
Lowest CO2 output456 g/mi444 g/mi ✓
Engines offeredSIDI, 6.4SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI
TransmissionsAutomatic 8-spdAutomatic (S8)
DrivetrainsRear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive4-Wheel Drive
Fuel typesRegular, PremiumPremium
EPA classStandard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WDStandard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
Years covered2022–20262020–2026
Configurations on record1654

Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.

Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs Land Rover Defender dimensions and size

The Jeep Grand Wagoneer is 27.2 inches longer than the Land Rover Defender on a wheelbase 3.9 inches longer, and 1,521.2 lbs heavier. At over 200 inches, the larger of the two is past the comfortable limit of a standard 192-inch single garage bay once you allow walking room.

Jeep Grand Wagoneer versus Land Rover Defender exterior dimensions
DimensionJeep Grand Wagoneer (2026)Land Rover Defender (2026)Difference
Length214.6 in187.4 in27.2 in
Width (excl. mirrors)83.5 in79.1 in4.3 in
Height75.6 in77.6 in2 in
Wheelbase122.8 in118.9 in3.9 in
Curb weight6,340 lbs4,819 lbs1,521 lbs

Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.

Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs Land Rover Defender: what the numbers mean

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Jeep Grand Wagoneer burns about $3,250 of fuel annually against $3,800 for the Land Rover Defender. That $550 yearly gap compounds to roughly $2,750 over five years and $4,400 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City versus highway split: the Land Rover Defender is the stronger commuter at 18 mpg city, while the Jeep Grand Wagoneer pulls ahead on the interstate at 24 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.

Powertrain choice: the Jeep Grand Wagoneer is recorded with 2 distinct engine configurations (SIDI, 6.4), the Land Rover Defender with 2 (SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI). Across 16 recorded Jeep Grand Wagoneer configurations and 54 for the Land Rover Defender, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.

Drivetrain and class: the Jeep Grand Wagoneer is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, the Land Rover Defender with 4-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Land Rover Defender emits 444 g/mile of CO2 versus 456 g/mile for the Jeep Grand Wagoneer. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.

Grand Wagoneer vs Defender: common questions

Which is better on gas, the Jeep Grand Wagoneer or the Land Rover Defender?

The Land Rover Defender is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 20 mpg combined versus 19 mpg for the Jeep Grand Wagoneer, a 1 mpg advantage and costs about $550 less per year to fuel.

Which costs less to run per year?

By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Jeep Grand Wagoneer runs about $3,250 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $3,800 for the Land Rover Defender — a difference of roughly $550 per year.

What engines do the Grand Wagoneer and Defender offer?

Jeep Grand Wagoneer: SIDI, 6.4. Land Rover Defender: SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI.

Are they in the same vehicle class?

Yes — the EPA classifies both the Jeep Grand Wagoneer and the Land Rover Defender as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they compete directly.

More Grand Wagoneer comparisons

More Defender comparisons

Comparison id: jeep-grand-wagoneer-vs-land-rover-defender