Jeep Cherokee vs Toyota Highlander: Specs Compared
Also searched as Toyota Highlander vs Jeep Cherokee specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.
The Jeep Cherokee is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 37 mpg combined versus 36 mpg for the Toyota Highlander, a 1 mpg advantage and costs about $50 less per year to fuel.
Across 4 measured categories, the Jeep Cherokee leads in 4. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2015–2026
Jeep Cherokee
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 79 configurations
2015–2026
Toyota Highlander
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 72 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Jeep Cherokee | Toyota Highlander |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 37 mpg ✓ | 36 mpg |
| Best city MPG | 39 mpg ✓ | 36 mpg |
| Best highway MPG | 35 mpg | 35 mpg |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $1,650 ✓ | $1,700 |
| Lowest CO2 output | 241 g/mi ✓ | 245 g/mi |
| Engines offered | Hybrid, 2.4, SIDI, 3.2 | SIDI & PFI; Hybrid, SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; with Stop-Start, SIDI & PFI; with Stop-start |
| Transmissions | Automatic (variable gear ratios), Automatic 9-spd | Automatic (AV-S6), Automatic (S8), Automatic (S6) |
| Drivetrains | All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive | All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Regular, Gasoline or E85, Midgrade | Regular |
| EPA class | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Years covered | 2015–2026 | 2015–2026 |
| Configurations on record | 79 | 72 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Jeep Cherokee vs Toyota Highlander dimensions and size
The Toyota Highlander is 6.7 inches longer than the Jeep Cherokee on a wheelbase 0.8 inches shorter, and 172 lbs lighter. Both clear the roughly 200 inches of usable length in a standard single garage bay.
| Dimension | Jeep Cherokee (2026) | Toyota Highlander (2026) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 188.2 in | 194.9 in | 6.7 in |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 74.8 in | 76 in | 1.2 in |
| Height | 67.3 in | 68.1 in | 0.8 in |
| Wheelbase | 113 in | 112.2 in | 0.8 in |
| Curb weight | 4,295 lbs | 4,123 lbs | 172 lbs |
Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.
Jeep Cherokee vs Toyota Highlander: what the numbers mean
Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Jeep Cherokee burns about $1,650 of fuel annually against $1,700 for the Toyota Highlander. That $50 yearly gap compounds to roughly $250 over five years and $400 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.
City versus highway split: the Jeep Cherokee is the stronger commuter at 39 mpg city, while the Toyota Highlander pulls ahead on the interstate at 35 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.
Powertrain choice: the Jeep Cherokee is recorded with 4 distinct engine configurations (Hybrid, 2.4, SIDI), the Toyota Highlander with 4 (SIDI & PFI; Hybrid, SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; with Stop-Start). Across 79 recorded Jeep Cherokee configurations and 72 for the Toyota Highlander, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.
Drivetrain and class: the Jeep Cherokee is offered with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive, the Toyota Highlander with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.
Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Jeep Cherokee emits 241 g/mile of CO2 versus 245 g/mile for the Toyota Highlander. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.
Cherokee vs Highlander: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Jeep Cherokee or the Toyota Highlander?
The Jeep Cherokee is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 37 mpg combined versus 36 mpg for the Toyota Highlander, a 1 mpg advantage and costs about $50 less per year to fuel.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Jeep Cherokee runs about $1,650 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $1,700 for the Toyota Highlander — a difference of roughly $50 per year.
What engines do the Cherokee and Highlander offer?
Jeep Cherokee: Hybrid, 2.4, SIDI, 3.2. Toyota Highlander: SIDI & PFI; Hybrid, SIDI & PFI, SIDI & PFI; with Stop-Start, SIDI & PFI; with Stop-start.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
The EPA classifies the Jeep Cherokee as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and the Toyota Highlander as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they aren't a like-for-like match on size.
More Cherokee comparisons
More Highlander comparisons
Comparison id: jeep-cherokee-vs-toyota-highlander