Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Volvo EX90: Specs Compared
Also searched as Volvo EX90 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 110 mpg combined versus 98 mpg for the Volvo EX90, a 12 mpg advantage and costs about $100 less per year to fuel.
Across 4 measured categories, the Ford Mustang Mach-E leads in 4. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2021–2026
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 41 configurations
2025–2027
Volvo EX90
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 15 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Ford Mustang Mach-E | Volvo EX90 |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 110 mpg ✓ | 98 mpg |
| Best city MPG | 115 mpg ✓ | 104 mpg |
| Best highway MPG | 104 mpg ✓ | 91 mpg |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $700 ✓ | $800 |
| Lowest CO2 output | Not available | Not available |
| Engines offered | Not available | Not available |
| Transmissions | Automatic (A1) | Automatic (A1) |
| Drivetrains | Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Electricity | Electricity |
| EPA class | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Years covered | 2021–2026 | 2025–2027 |
| Configurations on record | 41 | 15 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Volvo EX90 dimensions and size
The Volvo EX90 is 12.6 inches longer than the Ford Mustang Mach-E on a wheelbase 0.4 inches longer, and 1,340.4 lbs heavier. Both clear the roughly 200 inches of usable length in a standard single garage bay.
| Dimension | Ford Mustang Mach-E (2026) | Volvo EX90 (2026) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 185.8 in | 198.4 in | 12.6 in |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 74 in | 77.2 in | 3.1 in |
| Height | 63 in | 68.5 in | 5.5 in |
| Wheelbase | 116.9 in | 117.3 in | 0.4 in |
| Curb weight | 4,588 lbs | 5,928 lbs | 1,340 lbs |
Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Volvo EX90: what the numbers mean
Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Ford Mustang Mach-E burns about $700 of fuel annually against $800 for the Volvo EX90. That $100 yearly gap compounds to roughly $500 over five years and $800 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.
City and highway economy: the Ford Mustang Mach-E leads in both cycles — 115 mpg city and 104 mpg highway against 104 and 91 mpg — so its fuel-efficiency advantage holds whether you commute in traffic or cover long highway miles.
Drivetrain and class: the Ford Mustang Mach-E is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, the Volvo EX90 with All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.
Mustang Mach-E vs EX90: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Ford Mustang Mach-E or the Volvo EX90?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 110 mpg combined versus 98 mpg for the Volvo EX90, a 12 mpg advantage and costs about $100 less per year to fuel.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Ford Mustang Mach-E runs about $700 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $800 for the Volvo EX90 — a difference of roughly $100 per year.
What engines do the Mustang Mach-E and EX90 offer?
Ford Mustang Mach-E: no engine data on record. Volvo EX90: no engine data on record.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
The EPA classifies the Ford Mustang Mach-E as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and the Volvo EX90 as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they aren't a like-for-like match on size.
More Mustang Mach-E comparisons
More EX90 comparisons
Comparison id: ford-mustang-mach-e-vs-volvo-ex90