Ford Bronco Sport vs Nissan Pathfinder: Specs Compared
Also searched as Nissan Pathfinder vs Ford Bronco Sport specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.
The Ford Bronco Sport is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 27 mpg combined versus 26 mpg for the Nissan Pathfinder, a 1 mpg advantage and costs about $50 less per year to fuel.
Across 4 measured categories, the Ford Bronco Sport leads in 4. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2021–2026
Ford Bronco Sport
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 14 configurations
2015–2026
Nissan Pathfinder
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 39 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Ford Bronco Sport | Nissan Pathfinder |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 27 mpg ✓ | 26 mpg |
| Best city MPG | 25 mpg | 25 mpg |
| Best highway MPG | 30 mpg ✓ | 28 mpg |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $2,300 ✓ | $2,350 |
| Lowest CO2 output | 324 g/mi ✓ | 342 g/mi |
| Engines offered | SIDI & PFI, SIDI | SIDI, 3.5, 2.5 |
| Transmissions | Automatic 8-spd, Automatic (S8) | Automatic (S9), Automatic (variable gear ratios) |
| Drivetrains | 4-Wheel Drive, Part-time 4-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | 4-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Regular | Premium, Regular |
| EPA class | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Years covered | 2021–2026 | 2015–2026 |
| Configurations on record | 14 | 39 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Ford Bronco Sport vs Nissan Pathfinder dimensions and size
The Nissan Pathfinder is 24.4 inches longer than the Ford Bronco Sport on a wheelbase 9.1 inches longer, and 1,020.7 lbs heavier. Both clear the roughly 200 inches of usable length in a standard single garage bay.
| Dimension | Ford Bronco Sport (2026) | Nissan Pathfinder (2026) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 172.8 in | 197.2 in | 24.4 in |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 74.4 in | 78 in | 3.5 in |
| Height | 71.3 in | 70.9 in | 0.4 in |
| Wheelbase | 105.1 in | 114.2 in | 9.1 in |
| Curb weight | 3,457 lbs | 4,478 lbs | 1,021 lbs |
Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.
Ford Bronco Sport vs Nissan Pathfinder: what the numbers mean
Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Ford Bronco Sport burns about $2,300 of fuel annually against $2,350 for the Nissan Pathfinder. That $50 yearly gap compounds to roughly $250 over five years and $400 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.
City versus highway split: the Nissan Pathfinder is the stronger commuter at 25 mpg city, while the Ford Bronco Sport pulls ahead on the interstate at 30 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.
Powertrain choice: the Ford Bronco Sport is recorded with 2 distinct engine configurations (SIDI & PFI, SIDI), the Nissan Pathfinder with 3 (SIDI, 3.5, 2.5). Across 14 recorded Ford Bronco Sport configurations and 39 for the Nissan Pathfinder, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.
Drivetrain and class: the Ford Bronco Sport is offered with 4-Wheel Drive, Part-time 4-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, the Nissan Pathfinder with 4-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.
Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Ford Bronco Sport emits 324 g/mile of CO2 versus 342 g/mile for the Nissan Pathfinder. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.
Bronco Sport vs Pathfinder: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Ford Bronco Sport or the Nissan Pathfinder?
The Ford Bronco Sport is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 27 mpg combined versus 26 mpg for the Nissan Pathfinder, a 1 mpg advantage and costs about $50 less per year to fuel.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Ford Bronco Sport runs about $2,300 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,350 for the Nissan Pathfinder — a difference of roughly $50 per year.
What engines do the Bronco Sport and Pathfinder offer?
Ford Bronco Sport: SIDI & PFI, SIDI. Nissan Pathfinder: SIDI, 3.5, 2.5.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
Yes — the EPA classifies both the Ford Bronco Sport and the Nissan Pathfinder as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they compete directly.
More Bronco Sport comparisons
More Pathfinder comparisons
Comparison id: ford-bronco-sport-vs-nissan-pathfinder