BMW X5 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross: Specs Compared
Also searched as Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs BMW X5 specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.
The BMW X5 and Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross are evenly matched on fuel economy — both peak at 27 mpg combined — so the decision comes down to engine choice, drivetrain, and class.
Across 4 measured categories, the BMW X5 leads in 2. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2015–2027
BMW X5
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 61 configurations
2018–2026
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD · 28 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | BMW X5 | Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 27 mpg | 27 mpg |
| Best city MPG | 24 mpg | 26 mpg ✓ |
| Best highway MPG | 31 mpg ✓ | 29 mpg |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $2,900 | $2,300 ✓ |
| Lowest CO2 output | 130 g/mi ✓ | 327 g/mi |
| Engines offered | SIDI & PFI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI; PHEV, SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI | SIDI |
| Transmissions | Automatic (S8) | Automatic (AV-S8) |
| Drivetrains | All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive | 4-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Premium, Premium and Electricity, Diesel | Regular |
| EPA class | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Years covered | 2015–2027 | 2018–2026 |
| Configurations on record | 61 | 28 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
BMW X5 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross dimensions and size
The BMW X5 is 15 inches longer than the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross on a wheelbase 11.8 inches longer, and 2,085.6 lbs heavier. Both clear the roughly 200 inches of usable length in a standard single garage bay.
| Dimension | BMW X5 (2026) | Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross (2026) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 194.1 in | 179.1 in | 15 in |
| Width (excl. mirrors) | 78.7 in | 71.3 in | 7.5 in |
| Height | 68.9 in | 66.1 in | 2.8 in |
| Wheelbase | 116.9 in | 105.1 in | 11.8 in |
| Curb weight | 5,558 lbs | 3,472 lbs | 2,086 lbs |
Width excludes mirrors; add 8–12 inches for mirrors out. Figures are for the newest model year on record for each vehicle. See both drawn to scale.
BMW X5 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross: what the numbers mean
Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross burns about $2,300 of fuel annually against $2,900 for the BMW X5. That $600 yearly gap compounds to roughly $3,000 over five years and $4,800 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.
City versus highway split: the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is the stronger commuter at 26 mpg city, while the BMW X5 pulls ahead on the interstate at 31 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.
Powertrain choice: the BMW X5 is recorded with 4 distinct engine configurations (SIDI & PFI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI; PHEV, SIDI; Mild Hybrid), the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross with 1 (SIDI). Across 61 recorded BMW X5 configurations and 28 for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.
Drivetrain and class: the BMW X5 is offered with All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross with 4-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.
Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the BMW X5 emits 130 g/mile of CO2 versus 327 g/mile for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.
X5 vs Eclipse Cross: common questions
Which is better on gas, the BMW X5 or the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross?
The BMW X5 and Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross are evenly matched on fuel economy — both peak at 27 mpg combined — so the decision comes down to engine choice, drivetrain, and class.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross runs about $2,300 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,900 for the BMW X5 — a difference of roughly $600 per year.
What engines do the X5 and Eclipse Cross offer?
BMW X5: SIDI & PFI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI; PHEV, SIDI; Mild Hybrid, SIDI. Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross: SIDI.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
The EPA classifies the BMW X5 as Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD and the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross as Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD, so they aren't a like-for-like match on size.
More X5 comparisons
More Eclipse Cross comparisons
Comparison id: bmw-x5-vs-mitsubishi-eclipse-cross