BMW X1 vs Volkswagen GLI: Specs Compared

Also searched as Volkswagen GLI vs BMW X1 specs — both orientations show this same side-by-side comparison.

The Volkswagen GLI is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 30 mpg combined versus 28 mpg for the BMW X1, a 2 mpg advantage and costs about $650 less per year to fuel.

Across 5 measured categories, the Volkswagen GLI leads in 5. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.

2015–2026

BMW X1

Large Cars · 23 configurations

28mpg combined (best)
All BMW X1 specs

2022–2027

Volkswagen GLI

Compact Cars · 11 configurations

30mpg combined (best)
All Volkswagen GLI specs

Head-to-head specifications

MetricBMW X1Volkswagen GLI
Best combined MPG28 mpg30 mpg ✓
Best city MPG25 mpg26 mpg ✓
Best highway MPG34 mpg37 mpg ✓
Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year$2,700$2,050 ✓
Lowest CO2 output311 g/mi297 g/mi ✓
Engines offeredSIDI & PFI, SIDISIDI
TransmissionsAutomatic (AM-S7), Automatic (S8), Automatic (S6)Automatic (AM-S7), Manual 6-spd
DrivetrainsAll-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Fuel typesPremiumRegular
EPA classLarge CarsCompact Cars
Years covered2015–20262022–2027
Configurations on record2311

Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.

BMW X1 vs Volkswagen GLI: what the numbers mean

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Volkswagen GLI burns about $2,050 of fuel annually against $2,700 for the BMW X1. That $650 yearly gap compounds to roughly $3,250 over five years and $5,200 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City and highway economy: the Volkswagen GLI leads in both cycles — 26 mpg city and 37 mpg highway against 25 and 34 mpg — so its fuel-efficiency advantage holds whether you commute in traffic or cover long highway miles.

Powertrain choice: the BMW X1 is recorded with 2 distinct engine configurations (SIDI & PFI, SIDI), the Volkswagen GLI with 1 (SIDI). Across 23 recorded BMW X1 configurations and 11 for the Volkswagen GLI, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.

Drivetrain and class: the BMW X1 is offered with All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, the Volkswagen GLI with Front-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Large Cars and Compact Cars respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Volkswagen GLI emits 297 g/mile of CO2 versus 311 g/mile for the BMW X1. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.

X1 vs GLI: common questions

Which is better on gas, the BMW X1 or the Volkswagen GLI?

The Volkswagen GLI is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 30 mpg combined versus 28 mpg for the BMW X1, a 2 mpg advantage and costs about $650 less per year to fuel.

Which costs less to run per year?

By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Volkswagen GLI runs about $2,050 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,700 for the BMW X1 — a difference of roughly $650 per year.

What engines do the X1 and GLI offer?

BMW X1: SIDI & PFI, SIDI. Volkswagen GLI: SIDI.

Are they in the same vehicle class?

The EPA classifies the BMW X1 as Large Cars and the Volkswagen GLI as Compact Cars, so they aren't a like-for-like match on size.

More X1 comparisons

More GLI comparisons

Comparison id: bmw-x1-vs-volkswagen-gli