Audi TT vs BMW 8 Series: Specs Compared

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Audi TT burns about $2,350 of fuel annually against $3,050 for the BMW 8 Series. That $700 yearly gap compounds to roughly $3,500 over five years and $5,600 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City versus highway split: the BMW 8 Series is the stronger commuter at 23 mpg city, while the Audi TT pulls ahead on the interstate at 31 mpg highway. If most of your driving is stop-and-go traffic the city figure is the one to weigh; for long-distance highway mileage the reverse is true, and the two vehicles effectively swap places depending on how you drive.

Powertrain choice: the Audi TT is recorded with 1 distinct engine configuration (SIDI), the BMW 8 Series with 1 (SIDI). Across 12 recorded Audi TT configurations and 64 for the BMW 8 Series, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.

Drivetrain and class: the Audi TT is offered with All-Wheel Drive, the BMW 8 Series with All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Subcompact Cars and Subcompact Cars respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Audi TT emits 340 g/mile of CO2 versus 347 g/mile for the BMW 8 Series. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.