Aston Martin Vanquish vs Rolls-Royce Phantom: Specs Compared

Running cost over five years: at the EPA's 15,000-mile-a-year assumption the Aston Martin Vanquish burns about $4,750 of fuel annually against $5,450 for the Rolls-Royce Phantom. That $700 yearly gap compounds to roughly $3,500 over five years and $5,600 over eight — often more than the price difference between two trims of the same vehicle, and the single largest running-cost line item separating these two.

City and highway economy: the Aston Martin Vanquish leads in both cycles — 13 mpg city and 21 mpg highway against 12 and 20 mpg — so its fuel-efficiency advantage holds whether you commute in traffic or cover long highway miles.

Powertrain choice: the Aston Martin Vanquish is recorded with 2 distinct engine configurations (5.2, 6.0), the Rolls-Royce Phantom with 1 (SIDI). Across 10 recorded Aston Martin Vanquish configurations and 32 for the Rolls-Royce Phantom, the wider the engine spread the more the real-world fuel efficiency depends on which version you actually buy, so check the specific model year and drivetrain rather than the headline number.

Drivetrain and class: the Aston Martin Vanquish is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive, the Rolls-Royce Phantom with Rear-Wheel Drive. All-wheel drive typically costs one to two mpg combined against the same vehicle in front- or rear-wheel drive, which is worth remembering when the gap between these two is small. The EPA classes them as Minicompact Cars and Large Cars respectively — the class drives the interior volume, cargo space and passenger space each one is measured against.

Tailpipe emissions: at their cleanest configurations the Aston Martin Vanquish emits 554 g/mile of CO2 versus 609 g/mile for the Rolls-Royce Phantom. Emissions track fuel consumption almost exactly, so the cleaner vehicle here is also the cheaper one to fuel.